mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DevBench: A Realistic, Developer-Informed Benchmark for Code Generation Models

arXiv 2601.11895 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.SEcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

DevBench is a telemetry-driven benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) on realistic code completion tasks. It includes 1,800 evaluation instances across six programming languages and six task categories derived from real developer telemetry and synthesized using generator models from multiple provider families to mitigate single-source bias. Unlike prior benchmarks, it emphasizes ecological validity, avoids training data contamination, and enables detailed diagnostics. The evaluation combines functional correctness, similarity-based metrics, and LLM-judge assessments focused on usefulness and contextual relevance. 9 state-of-the-art models were assessed, with the strongest achieving only 43.5% Pass@1, confirming the benchmark remains challenging and revealing differences in syntactic precision, semantic reasoning, and practical utility. Our benchmark provides actionable insights to guide model selection and improvement, detail that is often missing from other benchmarks but is essential for both practical deployment and targeted model development.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

Builds on

24 of 48 references.

References · 24

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  6. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  7. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  8. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  9. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 279
  10. 2023CrossCodeEval: A Diverse and Multilingual Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completioncited by 183
  11. 2023ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generationcited by 168
  12. 2018Learning to Mine Aligned Code and Natural Language Pairs from Stack Overflowcited by 165
12 more
  1. 2018Mapping Language to Code in Programmatic Contextcited by 104
  2. 2023CodeBERTScore: Evaluating Code Generation with Pretrained Models of Codecited by 102
  3. 2024EvoCodeBench: An Evolving Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositoriescited by 72
  4. 2024On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Modelscited by 59
  5. 2024CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 44
  6. 2025CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Taskscited by 33
  7. 2024Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmarkcited by 30
  8. 2025AutoCodeBench: Large Language Models are Automatic Code Benchmark Generatorscited by 26
  9. 2024M2rc-Eval: Massively Multilingual Repository-level Code Completion Evaluationcited by 21
  10. 2024Benchmarks and Metrics for Evaluations of Code Generation: A Critical Reviewcited by 20
  11. 2025The Silent Judge: Unacknowledged Shortcut Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 15
  12. 2024RepoMasterEval: Evaluating Code Completion via Real-World Repositoriescited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.