POLARIS: Typed Planning and Governed Execution for Agentic AI in Back-Office Automation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise back office workflows require agentic systems that are auditable, policy-aligned, and operationally predictable, capabilities that generic multi-agent setups often fail to deliver. We present POLARIS (Policy-Aware LLM Agentic Reasoning for Integrated Systems), a governed orchestration framework that treats automation as typed plan synthesis and validated execution over LLM agents. A planner proposes structurally diverse, type checked directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), a rubric guided reasoning module selects a single compliant plan, and execution is guarded by validator gated checks, a bounded repair loop, and compiled policy guardrails that block or route side effects before they occur. Applied to document centric finance tasks, POLARIS produces decision grade artifacts and full execution traces while reducing human intervention. Empirically, POLARIS achieves a micro F1 of 0.81 on the SROIE dataset and, on a controlled synthetic suite, achieves 0.95 to 1.00 precision for anomaly routing with preserved audit trails. These evaluations constitute an initial benchmark for governed Agentic AI. POLARIS provides a methodological and benchmark reference for policy-aligned Agentic AI. Keywords Agentic AI, Enterprise Automation, Back-Office Tasks, Benchmarks, Governance, Typed Planning, Evaluation
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2026.
Builds on
13 of 17 references.
References · 13
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 339
- 2024The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Researchcited by 161
- 2023ProAgent: From Robotic Process Automation to Agentic Process Automationcited by 26
- 2025Agent-S: LLM Agentic workflow to automate Standard Operating Procedurescited by 10
- 2024SmartFlow: Robotic Process Automation using LLMscited by 5
- 2025FinRobot: Generative Business Process AI Agents for Enterprise Resource Planning in Financecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration
- 2025Agentic Lybic: Multi-Agent Execution System with Tiered Reasoning and Orchestration
- 2026A Reference Architecture for Integrating Agentic AI into Enterprise Software: Responsibilities, Interactions, and Variability
- 2026SARC: A Governance-by-Architecture Framework for Agentic AI Systems
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Eluna: An Agentic LLM System for Automating Warehouse Operations with Reasoning and Task Execution
- 2026Evaluating Bounded Autonomy in Regulated Agentic AI: A Diagnostic Harness with Constitutional Rewards, Escalation Labels, and Runtime Governance
- 2026Beyond Autonomy: A Dynamic Tiered AgentRunner Framework for Governable and Resilient Enterprise AI Execution