SPRInG: Continual LLM Personalization via Selective Parametric Adaptation and Retrieval-Interpolated Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalizing Large Language Models typically relies on static retrieval or one-time adaptation, assuming user preferences remain invariant over time. However, real-world interactions are dynamic, where user interests continuously evolve, posing a challenge for models to adapt to preference drift without catastrophic forgetting. Standard continual learning approaches often struggle in this context, as they indiscriminately update on noisy interaction streams, failing to distinguish genuine preference shifts from transient contexts. To address this, we introduce SPRInG, a novel semi-parametric framework designed for effective continual personalization. During training, SPRInG employs drift-driven selective adaptation, which utilizes a likelihood-based scoring function to identify high-novelty interactions, selectively updating the user-specific adapter on drift signals while preserving hard-to-learn residuals in a replay buffer. During inference, we apply strict relevance gating and fuse parametric knowledge with retrieved history via probability interpolation. Experiments on the long-form personalized generation benchmark demonstrate that SPRInG significantly outperforms existing baselines, validating its robustness for real-world continual personalization.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 31 references.
References · 18
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 376
- 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
- 2024Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 228
- 2023Language Models Meet World Models: Embodied Experiences Enhance Language Modelscited by 123
- 2023Aligning Language Models to User Opinionscited by 98
- 2024LongLaMP: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Text Generationcited by 91
- 2022Continual Learning of Natural Language Processing Tasks: A Surveycited by 83
- 2017Wasserstein Dictionary Learning: Optimal Transport-based unsupervised non-linear dictionary learningcited by 34
6 more
- 2025NextQuill: Causal Preference Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalizationcited by 29
- 2024Unlocking Continual Learning Abilities in Language Modelscited by 22
- 2025PROPER: A Progressive Learning Framework for Personalized Large Language Models with Group-Level Adaptationcited by 22
- 2024Online Continual Learning For Interactive Instruction Following Agentscited by 21
- 2025Personalized LLM Decoding via Contrasting Personal Preferencecited by 12
- 2024Budgeted Online Continual Learning by Adaptive Layer Freezing and Frequency-based Samplingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Forget to Improve: On-Device LLM-Agent Continual Learning via Budget-Curated Memorycited by 8
- 2026Large Language Models Should Learn Personalized Rather Than Aggregated Human Preferencescited by 0
- 2026COPE: Continual Personalization of LLMs under Sparse User Feedback via User Embeddings and Self-Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026ALLOT: Budgeted Hybrid-Memory Routing for Knowledge Updates in LLMscited by 0
- 2026ALLOT: Budgeted Hybrid-Memory Routing for Knowledge Updates in LLMs26 Sep 2026
- 2026COPE: Continual Personalization of LLMs under Sparse User Feedback via User Embeddings and Self-Evaluation22 Sep 2026
- 2026Forget to Improve: On-Device LLM-Agent Continual Learning via Budget-Curated Memory23 Jun 2026
- 2026Large Language Models Should Learn Personalized Rather Than Aggregated Human Preferences30 May 2026