mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepResearchEval: An Automated Framework for Deep Research Task Construction and Agentic Evaluation

arXiv 2601.09688 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 13

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep research systems are widely used for multi-step web research, analysis, and cross-source synthesis, yet their evaluation remains challenging. Existing benchmarks often require annotation-intensive task construction, rely on static evaluation dimensions, or fail to reliably verify facts when citations are missing. To bridge these gaps, we introduce DeepResearchEval, an automated framework for deep research task construction and agentic evaluation. For task construction, we propose a persona-driven pipeline generating realistic, complex research tasks anchored in diverse user profiles, applying a two-stage filter Task Qualification and Search Necessity to retain only tasks requiring multi-source evidence integration and external retrieval. For evaluation, we propose an agentic pipeline with two components: an Adaptive Point-wise Quality Evaluation that dynamically derives task-specific evaluation dimensions, criteria, and weights conditioned on each generated task, and an Active Fact-Checking that autonomously extracts and verifies report statements via web search, even when citations are missing.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DEER: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deep Research Agents on Expert Report Generation19 Dec
  2. 2025DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecycle3 Dec
  3. 2025ReportBench: Evaluating Deep Research Agents via Academic Survey Tasks14 Aug
  4. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent8 Aug
  5. 2025DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents13 Jun

Other references · 7

  1. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  2. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  3. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
  4. 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 320
  5. 2025Organize the Web: Constructing Domains Enhances Pre-Training Data Curationcited by 73
  6. 2025ResearcherBench: Evaluating Deep AI Research Systems on the Frontiers of Scientific Inquirycited by 30
  7. 2025UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarioscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research
  2. 2026From Intent to Evidence: A Categorical Approach for Structural Evaluation of Deep Research Agents
  3. 2026DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing
  4. 2025Deep Research Bench: Evaluating AI Web Research Agents
  5. 2025Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge
  6. 2025Dr. Bench: A Multidimensional Evaluation for Deep Research Agents, from Answers to Reports
  7. 2025Deep Research: A Survey of Autonomous Research Agents
  8. 2026DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports