Universal Dynamics of Warmup Stable Decay: understanding WSD beyond Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Warmup Stable Decay (WSD) learning rate scheduler has recently become popular, largely due to its good performance and flexibility when training large language models. It remains an open question whether the remarkable performance of WSD - using a decaying learning rate for only a fraction of training compared to cosine decay - is a phenomenon specific to transformer-based language models that can potentially offer new theoretical insights into their training dynamics. Inspired by the usage of learning rate schedulers as a new lens into understanding landscape geometry (e.g., river valley, connected minima, progressive sharpening), in this work we compare the WSD path of the Adam optimizer on a Pythia-like language model to that of a small CNN trained to classify CIFAR10 images. We observe most training signals, optimizer path features, and sharpness dynamics to be qualitatively similar in such architectures. This consistency points to shared geometric characteristics of the loss landscapes of old and new nonconvex problems, and hints to future research questions around the geometry of high dimensional optimization problems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.
Builds on
11 of 15 references.
References · 11
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 85
- 2016Gradient Descent Learns Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 78
- 2024Understanding Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rates: A River Valley Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 75
- 2018A Walk with SGDcited by 74
- 2025The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Trainingcited by 31
- 2025Beyond Cosine Decay: On the effectiveness of Infinite Learning Rate Schedule for Continual Pre-trainingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Pre-training LLM without Learning Rate Decay Enhances Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 12
- 2026Anytime Pretraining: Horizon-Free Learning-Rate Schedules with Weight Averagingcited by 8
- 2026ScheduleFree+: Scaling Learning-Rate-Free & Schedule-Free Learning to Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2026(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtrainingcited by 4
- 2026AMUSE: Anytime Muon with Stable Gradient Evaluationcited by 3
- 2026AMUSE: Anytime Muon with Stable Gradient Evaluation21 May 2026
- 2026ScheduleFree+: Scaling Learning-Rate-Free & Schedule-Free Learning to Large Language Models18 May 2026
- 2026(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtraining15 Apr 2026
- 2026Pre-training LLM without Learning Rate Decay Enhances Supervised Fine-Tuning17 Mar 2026
- 2026Anytime Pretraining: Horizon-Free Learning-Rate Schedules with Weight Averaging3 Feb 2026