SoC: Semantic Orthogonal Calibration for Test-Time Prompt Tuning
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increasing adoption of vision-language models (VLMs) in critical decision-making systems such as healthcare or autonomous driving, the calibration of their uncertainty estimates becomes paramount. Yet, this dimension has been largely underexplored in the VLM test-time prompt-tuning (TPT) literature, which has predominantly focused on improving their discriminative performance. Recent state-of-the-art advocates for enforcing full orthogonality over pairs of text prompt embeddings to enhance separability, and therefore calibration. Nevertheless, as we theoretically show in this work, the inherent gradients from fully orthogonal constraints will strongly push semantically related classes away, ultimately making the model overconfident. Based on our findings, we propose Semantic Orthogonal Calibration (SoC), a Huber-based regularizer that enforces smooth prototype separation while preserving semantic proximity, thereby improving calibration compared to prior orthogonality-based approaches. Across a comprehensive empirical validation, we demonstrate that SoC consistently improves calibration performance, while also maintaining competitive discriminative capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 41 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.
Builds on
41 of 54 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2025O-TPT: Orthogonality Constraints for Calibrating Test-time Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models15 Mar
- 2025Shift-Aware Calibration for Fine-Tuned CLIP: Leveraging Image-Text Alignment31 Jan
- 2024BayesAdapter: enhanced uncertainty estimation in CLIP few-shot adaptation12 Dec
- 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion21 Mar
- 2024An Empirical Study Into What Matters for Calibrating Vision-Language Models12 Feb
- 2024Open-Vocabulary Calibration for Fine-tuned CLIP7 Feb
- 2023Towards Calibrated Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models3 Nov
- 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimization23 Mar
- 2022CLIP-ReID: Exploiting Vision-Language Model for Image Re-Identification without Concrete Text Labels25 Nov
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep
Other references · 29
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
17 more
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
- 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
- 2024VLP: Vision Language Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 125
- 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
- 2024Robust Calibration of Large Vision-Language Adapterscited by 28
- 2024BiomedCoOp: Learning to Prompt for Biomedical Vision-Language Modelscited by 28
- 2022Class Adaptive Network Calibrationcited by 13
- 2023Beyond Probability Partitions: Calibrating Neural Networks with Semantic Aware Groupingcited by 10
- 2025Few-Shot, Now for Real: Medical VLMs Adaptation without Balanced Sets or Validationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A-TPT: Angular Diversity Calibration Properties for Test-Time Prompt Tuning of Vision-Language Models
- 2026Improving Calibration in Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Data-Free Flatness-Aware Prompt Pretraining
- 2025Prompting without Panic: Attribute-aware, Zero-shot, Test-Time Calibration
- 2025D-TPT: Dimensional Entropy Maximization for Calibrating Test-Time Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Towards Calibrating Prompt Tuning of Vision-Language Models
- 2026SS-TPT: Stability and Suitability-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
- 2025PARC: A Quantitative Framework Uncovering the Symmetries within Vision Language Models
- 2026When Prompts Ignore Structure: Graph-Based Attribute Reasoning for Calibrated VLMs