mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analyzing the effect of prediction accuracy on the distributionally-robust competitive ratio

arXiv 2601.06813 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The field of algorithms with predictions aims to improve algorithm performance by integrating machine learning predictions into algorithm design. A central question in this area is how predictions can improve performance, and a key aspect of this analysis is the role of prediction accuracy. In this context, prediction accuracy is defined as a guaranteed probability that an instance drawn from the distribution belongs to the predicted set. As a performance measure that incorporates prediction accuracy, we focus on the distributionally-robust competitive ratio (DRCR), introduced by Sun et al.~(ICML 2024). The DRCR is defined as the expected ratio between the algorithm's cost and the optimal cost, where the expectation is taken over the worst-case instance distribution that satisfies the given prediction and accuracy requirement. A known structural property is that, for any fixed algorithm, the DRCR decreases linearly as prediction accuracy increases. Building on this result, we establish that the optimal DRCR value (i.e., the infimum over all algorithms) is a monotone and concave function of prediction accuracy. We further generalize the DRCR framework to a multiple-prediction setting and show that monotonicity and concavity are preserved in this setting. Finally, we apply our results to the ski rental problem, a benchmark problem in online optimization, to identify the conditions on prediction accuracies required for the optimal DRCR to attain a target value. Moreover, we provide a method for computing the critical accuracy, defined as the minimum accuracy required for the optimal DRCR to strictly improve upon the performance attainable without any accuracy guarantee.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.

Builds on

16 of 32 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
  3. 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 152
  4. 2020The Primal-Dual method for Learning Augmented Algorithmscited by 78
  5. 2024Improving Online Algorithms via ML Predictionscited by 65
  6. 2020Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithmscited by 64
  7. 2019Online Computation with Untrusted Advicecited by 42
  8. 2022Customizing ML Predictions for Online Algorithmscited by 21
  9. 2021Learning-Augmented Dynamic Power Management with Multiple States via New Ski Rental Boundscited by 20
  10. 2023Improved Learning-Augmented Algorithms for the Multi-Option Ski Rental Problem via Best-Possible Competitive Analysiscited by 16
  11. 2023Online Algorithms with Uncertainty-Quantified Predictionscited by 9
  12. 2024Learning-Augmented Algorithms for the Bahncard Problemcited by 7
4 more
  1. 2025Algorithms with Calibrated Machine Learning Predictionscited by 7
  2. 2021Sequential Ski Rental Problemcited by 3
  3. 2023On Optimal Consistency-Robustness Trade-Off for Learning-Augmented Multi-Option Ski Rentalcited by 2
  4. 2024Equilibria in multiagent online problems with predictionscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.