mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CyberLLM-FINDS 2025: Instruction-Tuned Fine-tuning of Domain-Specific LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Graph Integration for MITRE Evaluation

arXiv 2601.06779 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2026cs.CRcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as Gemma-2B have shown strong performance in various natural language processing tasks. However, general-purpose models often lack the domain expertise required for cybersecurity applications. This work presents a methodology to fine-tune the Gemma-2B model into a domain-specific cybersecurity LLM. We detail the processes of dataset preparation, fine-tuning, and synthetic data generation, along with implications for real-world applications in threat detection, forensic investigation, and attack analysis. Experiments highlight challenges in prompt length distribution during domain-specific fine-tuning. Uneven prompt lengths limit the model's effective use of the context window, constraining local inference to 200-400 tokens despite hardware support for longer sequences. Chain-of-thought styled prompts, paired with quantized weights, yielded the best performance under these constraints. To address context limitations, we employed a hybrid strategy using cloud LLMs for synthetic data generation and local fine-tuning for deployment efficiency. To extend the evaluation, we introduce a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline and graph-based reasoning framework. This approach enables structured alignment with MITRE ATT&CK techniques through STIX-based threat intelligence, enhancing recall in multi-hop and long-context scenarios. Graph modules encode entity-neighborhood context and tactic chains, helping mitigate the constraints of short prompt windows. Results demonstrate improved model alignment with tactic, technique, and procedure (TTP) coverage, validating the utility of graph-augmented LLMs in cybersecurity threat intelligence applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 3 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.

Builds on

3 of 14 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  3. 2020Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentationcited by 596

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fine-tuning of Large Language Models for Domain-Specific Cybersecurity Knowledge
  2. 2023Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation
  3. 2025CyberLLMInstruct: A Pseudo-malicious Dataset Revealing Safety-performance Trade-offs in Cyber Security LLM Fine-tuning
  4. 2025AttackSeqBench: Benchmarking the Capabilities of LLMs for Attack Sequences Understanding
  5. 2025CTIConnect: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over Heterogeneous Cyber Threat Intelligence
  6. 2025AthenaBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence
  7. 2025Adapting Large Language Models to Emerging Cybersecurity using Retrieval Augmented Generation
  8. 2025Less Data, More Security: Advancing Cybersecurity LLMs Specialization via Resource-Efficient Domain-Adaptive Continuous Pre-training with Minimal Tokens