mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MedEinst: Benchmarking the Einstellung Effect in Medical LLMs through Counterfactual Differential Diagnosis

arXiv 2601.06636 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite achieving high accuracy on medical benchmarks, LLMs exhibit the Einstellung Effect in clinical diagnosis--relying on statistical shortcuts rather than patient-specific evidence, causing misdiagnosis in atypical cases. Existing benchmarks fail to detect this critical failure mode. We introduce MedEinst, a counterfactual benchmark with 5,383 paired clinical cases across 49 diseases. Each pair contains a control case and a "trap" case with altered discriminative evidence that flips the diagnosis. We measure susceptibility via Bias Trap Rate--probability of misdiagnosing traps despite correctly diagnosing controls. Extensive Evaluation of 17 LLMs shows frontier models achieve high baseline accuracy but severe bias trap rates. Thus, we propose ECR-Agent, aligning LLM reasoning with Evidence-Based Medicine standard via two components: (1) Dynamic Causal Inference (DCI) performs structured reasoning through dual-pathway perception, dynamic causal graph reasoning across three levels (association, intervention, counterfactual), and evidence audit for final diagnosis; (2) Critic-Driven Graph and Memory Evolution (CGME) iteratively refines the system by storing validated reasoning paths in an exemplar base and consolidating disease-specific knowledge into evolving illness graphs. Source code is to be released.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2026.

Builds on

14 of 22 references.

References · 14

  1. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  2. 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
  3. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
  4. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
  5. 2023MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoningcited by 311
  6. 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
  7. 2024AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environmentscited by 215
  8. 2024Medical Graph RAG: Towards Safe Medical Large Language Model via Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 89
  9. 2022DDXPlus: A New Dataset For Automatic Medical Diagnosiscited by 87
  10. 2024Addressing cognitive bias in medical language modelscited by 34
  11. 2024ClinicalBench: Can LLMs Beat Traditional ML Models in Clinical Prediction?cited by 31
  12. 2025Limitations of Large Language Models in Clinical Problem-Solving Arising from Inflexible Reasoningcited by 29
2 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models are Fixated by Red Herrings: Exploring Creative Problem Solving and Einstellung Effect using the Only Connect Wall Datasetcited by 17
  2. 2024Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice with Interactive Sequencecited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DiagLoop: A Counterfactual Data Flywheel with Stage-Localized Reinforcement for Diagnostic LLMs
  2. 2026Improving Clinical Diagnosis with Counterfactual Multi-Agent Reasoning
  3. 2026CLExEval: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Qualitative Evaluation of LLM Clinical Reasoning
  4. 2025DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models
  5. 2026SUP-MIMIC: A Multi-Task Clinical Diagnosis Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Robustness to Contradictory Evidence
  6. 2026Counterfactual Evaluation Reveals Hidden Capability Profiles in Clinical LLMs and Agents
  7. 2025MedMMV: A Controllable Multimodal Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Verifiable Clinical Reasoning
  8. 2026Clinical Reasoning Graphs: Structured Evaluation of LLM Diagnostic Reasoning Reveals Competence Without Consistency