Illusions of Confidence? Diagnosing LLM Truthfulness via Neighborhood Consistency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world settings, correctness alone is insufficient. Reliable deployment requires maintaining truthful beliefs under contextual perturbations. Existing evaluations largely rely on point-wise confidence like Self-Consistency, which can mask brittle belief. We show that even facts answered with perfect self-consistency can rapidly collapse under mild contextual interference. To address this gap, we propose Neighbor-Consistency Belief (NCB), a structural measure of belief robustness that evaluates response coherence across a conceptual neighborhood. To validate the efficiency of NCB, we introduce a new cognitive stress-testing protocol that probes outputs stability under contextual interference. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that the performance of high-NCB data is relatively more resistant to interference. Finally, we present Structure-Aware Training (SAT), which optimizes context-invariant belief structure and reduces long-tail knowledge brittleness by approximately 30%. Code is available at https://github.com/zjunlp/belief.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.
Builds on
40 of 74 references.
References · 40
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
- 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 373
- 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 356
- 2023Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology Viewcited by 222
- 2022Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidencecited by 144
- 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
- 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 117
28 more
- 2024What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Knowcited by 110
- 2024Cutting Off the Head Ends the Conflict: A Mechanism for Interpreting and Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Language Modelscited by 91
- 2025Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?cited by 75
- 2022OntoProtein: Protein Pretraining With Gene Ontology Embeddingcited by 70
- 2024WikiContradict: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Knowledge Conflicts from Wikipediacited by 44
- 2024Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2023Are Large Language Models Ready for Healthcare? A Comparative Study on Clinical Language Understandingcited by 40
- 2025A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontierscited by 37
- 2025Steering Evaluation-Aware Language Models to Act Like They Are Deployedcited by 35
- 2024Forking Paths in Neural Text Generationcited by 34
- 2025Belief Dynamics Reveal the Dual Nature of In-Context Learning and Activation Steeringcited by 29
- 2025Accumulating Context Changes the Beliefs of Language Modelscited by 28
- 2025Believe It or Not: How Deeply do LLMs Believe Implanted Facts?cited by 24
- 2025Too Consistent to Detect: A Study of Self-Consistent Errors in LLMscited by 18
- 2025Language Models Can Learn from Verbal Feedback Without Scalar Rewardscited by 18
- 2023ChatGPT is a Remarkable Tool -- For Expertscited by 16
- 2025Thought Branches: Interpreting LLM Reasoning Requires Resamplingcited by 16
- 2025A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoningcited by 14
- 2025Are LLM Belief Updates Consistent with Bayes' Theorem?cited by 9
- 2025Language Models Change Facts Based on the Way You Talkcited by 8
- 2025Martingale Score: An Unsupervised Metric for Bayesian Rationality in LLM Reasoningcited by 5
- 2025The Curious Case of Factuality Finetuning: Models' Internal Beliefs Can Improve Factualitycited by 4
- 2025Discursive Circuits: How Do Language Models Understand Discourse Relations?cited by 4
- 2025CritiCal: Can Critique Help LLM Uncertainty or Confidence Calibration?cited by 4
- 2025Large Language Models Could Be Rote Learnerscited by 2
- 2025From Confidence to Collapse in LLM Factual Robustnesscited by 2
- 2025BEDA: Belief Estimation as Probabilistic Constraints for Performing Strategic Dialogue Actscited by 2
- 2025How Do People Revise Inconsistent Beliefs? Examining Belief Revision in Humans with User Studiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models
- 2025Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs
- 2026Can We Trust LLM's Logic? Quantifying Uncertainty, Coherence, and Robustness via a Graph-Based Framework
- 2026Consensus is Not Verification: Why Crowd Wisdom Strategies Fail for LLM Truthfulness
- 2026Quantifying Consistency in LLM Logical Reasoning via Structural Uncertainty
- 2023Self-Consistency of Large Language Models under Ambiguity
- 2026Does Inference Scaling Improve Reasoning Faithfulness? A Multi-Model Analysis of Self-Consistency Tradeoffs
- 2024To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contexts