mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Local Updates in Distributed Optimization: Provable Acceleration and Topology Effects

arXiv 2601.03442 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inspired by the success of performing multiple local optimization steps between communication rounds in federated learning, incorporating such local updates into distributed optimization has recently attracted growing interest. However, unlike federated learning, where local updates can accelerate training by reducing gradient estimation error under minibatch settings, it remains unclear whether similar benefits persist when exact gradients are available. Moreover, existing theoretical results typically require reducing the step size when multiple local updates are employed, which can entirely offset any potential benefit of these additional local updates. In this paper, we focus on the classic DIGing algorithm and leverage the tight performance bounds provided by Performance Estimation Problems (PEP) to show that incorporating local updates can indeed accelerate distributed optimization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first rigorous demonstration of such acceleration for a broad class of objective functions. Our analysis further reveals that, under an appropriate step size, performing only two local updates is sufficient to achieve the maximal possible improvement, and that additional local updates provide no further gains. Because more updates increase computational cost, these findings offer practical guidance for efficient implementation. We also show that these speed gains depend critically on the network structure, with sparser or less connected graphs, characterized by the spectral properties of the mixing matrix, yielding smaller improvements. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets corroborate the theoretical findings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  2. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
  3. 2019FedPAQ: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Method with Periodic Averaging and Quantizationcited by 349
  4. 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
  5. 2016Achieving Geometric Convergence for Distributed Optimization over Time-Varying Graphscited by 149
  6. 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
  7. 2016NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 107
  8. 2018Push-Pull Gradient Methods for Distributed Optimization in Networkscited by 45
  9. 2023Decentralized Gradient Tracking with Local Stepscited by 32
  10. 2018A linear algorithm for optimization over directed graphs with geometric convergencecited by 25
  11. 2023Local Exact-Diffusion for Decentralized Optimization and Learningcited by 24
  12. 2022On the Performance of Gradient Tracking with Local Updatescited by 21
12 more
  1. 2015Exact Worst-case Performance of First-order Methods for Composite Convex Optimizationcited by 16
  2. 2022Branch-and-Bound Performance Estimation Programming: A Unified Methodology for Constructing Optimal Optimization Methodscited by 16
  3. 2024Robust Decentralized Learning with Local Updates and Gradient Trackingcited by 8
  4. 2024The Effectiveness of Local Updates for Decentralized Learning under Data Heterogeneitycited by 7
  5. 2022Automatic Performance Estimation for Decentralized Optimizationcited by 3
  6. 2025Numerical Design of Optimized First-Order Algorithmscited by 3
  7. 2018On the Location of the Minimizer of the Sum of Two Strongly Convex Functionscited by 2
  8. 2024Exploiting Agent Symmetries for Performance Analysis of Distributed Optimization Methodscited by 2
  9. 2025Several Performance Bounds on Decentralized Online Optimization are Highly Conservative and Potentially Misleadingcited by 2
  10. 2023The Minimizer of the Sum of Two Strongly Convex Functionscited by 1
  11. 2024On the Set of Possible Minimizers of a Sum of Convex Functionscited by 1
  12. 2025Guaranteeing Both Consensus and Optimality in Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Multiple Local Updatescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.