mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Effectiveness of Local Updates for Decentralized Learning under Data Heterogeneity

arXiv 2403.15654 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2024cs.LG math.OCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We revisit two fundamental decentralized optimization methods, Decentralized Gradient Tracking (DGT) and Decentralized Gradient Descent (DGD), with multiple local updates. We consider two settings and demonstrate that incorporating local update steps can reduce communication complexity. Specifically, for μ-strongly convex and L-smooth loss functions, we proved that local DGT achieves communication complexity tildeO Big(fracLμ(K+1) + fracδ + μμ (1 - ρ) + fracρ (1 - ρ)2 · fracL+ δμBig), %zhizeseems to be tildeO where K is the number of additional local update, ρ measures the network connectivity and δ measures the second-order heterogeneity of the local losses. Our results reveal the tradeoff between communication and computation and show increasing K can effectively reduce communication costs when the data heterogeneity is low and the network is well-connected. We then consider the over-parameterization regime where the local losses share the same minimums. We proved that employing local updates in DGD, even without gradient correction, achieves exact linear convergence under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) condition, which can yield a similar effect as DGT in reducing communication complexity. Customization of the result to linear models is further provided, with improved rate expression. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical results.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2024.

Builds on

36 of 66 references.

References · 36

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  3. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
  4. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
  5. 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
  6. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
  7. 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 231
  8. 2014EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimizationcited by 160
  9. 2020Federated Learning with Compression: Unified Analysis and Sharp Guaranteescited by 159
  10. 2013On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 158
  11. 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
  12. 2017The Power of Interpolation: Understanding the Effectiveness of SGD in Modern Over-parametrized Learningcited by 150
24 more
  1. 2016Achieving Geometric Convergence for Distributed Optimization over Time-Varying Graphscited by 149
  2. 2020Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed Learningcited by 147
  3. 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
  4. 2017Network Topology and Communication-Computation Tradeoffs in Decentralized Optimizationcited by 119
  5. 2016NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 107
  6. 2017Stability and Generalization of Learning Algorithms that Converge to Global Optimacited by 100
  7. 2020Tight Bounds on the Smallest Eigenvalue of the Neural Tangent Kernel for Deep ReLU Networkscited by 87
  8. 2020An improved convergence analysis for decentralized online stochastic non-convex optimizationcited by 53
  9. 2016On Nonconvex Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 42
  10. 2022The Implicit Bias of Benign Overfittingcited by 38
  11. 2018Graph Oracle Models, Lower Bounds, and Gaps for Parallel Stochastic Optimizationcited by 34
  12. 2019Variance-Reduced Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Accelerated Convergencecited by 33
  13. 2023Decentralized Gradient Tracking with Local Stepscited by 32
  14. 2021Accelerating Gossip SGD with Periodic Global Averagingcited by 25
  15. 2023Local Exact-Diffusion for Decentralized Optimization and Learningcited by 24
  16. 2021A Hybrid Variance-Reduced Method for Decentralized Stochastic Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 21
  17. 2022On the Performance of Gradient Tracking with Local Updatescited by 21
  18. 2021DESTRESS: Computation-Optimal and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Nonconvex Finite-Sum Optimizationcited by 16
  19. 2023Stochastic Distributed Optimization under Average Second-order Similarity: Algorithms and Analysiscited by 11
  20. 2021Local SGD Optimizes Overparameterized Neural Networks in Polynomial Timecited by 10
  21. 2018Tutorial on dynamic average consensus: the problem, its applications, and the algorithmscited by 8
  22. 2023An Enhanced Gradient-Tracking Bound for Distributed Online Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 5
  23. 2023On the Computation-Communication Trade-Off with A Flexible Gradient Tracking Approachcited by 4
  24. 2023Gradient and Variable Tracking with Multiple Local SGD for Decentralized Non-Convex Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.