mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ToxiGAN: Toxic Data Augmentation via LLM-Guided Directional Adversarial Generation

arXiv 2601.03121 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Augmenting toxic language data in a controllable and class-specific manner is crucial for improving robustness in toxicity classification, yet remains challenging due to limited supervision and distributional skew. We propose ToxiGAN, a class-aware text augmentation framework that combines adversarial generation with semantic guidance from large language models (LLMs). To address common issues in GAN-based augmentation such as mode collapse and semantic drift, ToxiGAN introduces a two-step directional training strategy and leverages LLM-generated neutral texts as semantic ballast. Unlike prior work that treats LLMs as static generators, our approach dynamically selects neutral exemplars to provide balanced guidance. Toxic samples are explicitly optimized to diverge from these exemplars, reinforcing class-specific contrastive signals. Experiments on four hate speech benchmarks show that ToxiGAN achieves the strongest average performance in both macro-F1 and hate-F1, consistently outperforming traditional and LLM-based augmentation methods. Ablation and sensitivity analyses further confirm the benefits of semantic ballast and directional training in enhancing classifier robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  5. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  6. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  7. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  8. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  9. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  10. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  11. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  12. 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 375
13 more
  1. 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 209
  2. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  3. 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 185
  4. 2019A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speechcited by 128
  5. 2018Language GANs Falling Shortcited by 97
  6. 2019Addressing Semantic Drift in Question Generation for Semi-Supervised Question Answeringcited by 63
  7. 2017Maximum-Likelihood Augmented Discrete Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 39
  8. 2024Know When To Stop: A Study of Semantic Drift in Text Generationcited by 18
  9. 2024ToxiCraft: A Novel Framework for Synthetic Generation of Harmful Informationcited by 17
  10. 2019CatGAN: Category-aware Generative Adversarial Networks with Hierarchical Evolutionary Learning for Category Text Generationcited by 16
  11. 2024ToxiLab: How Well Do Open-Source LLMs Generate Synthetic Toxicity Data?cited by 5
  12. 2023Hateful Messages: A Conversational Data Set of Hate Speech produced by Adolescents on Discordcited by 3
  13. 2023Feature-aware conditional GAN for category text generationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.