PCEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Physical Computing Capabilities of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains, including software development, education, and technical assistance. Among these, software development is one of the key areas where LLMs are increasingly adopted. However, when hardware constraints are considered-for instance, in physical computing, where software must interact with and control physical hardware -their effectiveness has not been fully explored. To address this gap, we introduce textscPCEval (Physical Computing Evaluation), the first benchmark in physical computing that enables a fully automatic evaluation of the capabilities of LLM in both the logical and physical aspects of the projects, without requiring human assessment. Our evaluation framework assesses LLMs in generating circuits and producing compatible code across varying levels of project complexity. Through comprehensive testing of 13 leading models, textscPCEval provides the first reproducible and automatically validated empirical assessment of LLMs' ability to reason about fundamental hardware implementation constraints within a simulation environment. Our findings reveal that while LLMs perform well in code generation and logical circuit design, they struggle significantly with physical breadboard layout creation, particularly in managing proper pin connections and avoiding circuit errors. textscPCEval advances our understanding of AI assistance in hardware-dependent computing environments and establishes a foundation for developing more effective tools to support physical computing education.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2025.
Builds on
17 of 34 references.
References · 17
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
- 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligencecited by 331
- 2023VerilogEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Verilog Code Generationcited by 252
- 2023VeriGen: A Large Language Model for Verilog Code Generationcited by 200
- 2024AnalogCoder: Analog Circuit Design via Training-Free Code Generationcited by 84
5 more
- 2024LayoutCopilot: An LLM-powered Multi-agent Collaborative Framework for Interactive Analog Layout Designcited by 25
- 2024Enhancing Computer Programming Education with LLMs: A Study on Effective Prompt Engineering for Python Code Generationcited by 9
- 2024EmbedGenius: Towards Automated Software Development for Generic Embedded IoT Systemscited by 6
- 2025ResBench: Benchmarking LLM-Generated FPGA Designs with Resource Awarenesscited by 5
- 2023From Words to Wires: Generating Functioning Electronic Devices from Natural Language Descriptionscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.