mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse Threats, Focused Defense: Criticality-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2601.01800 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown considerable potential in autonomous driving (AD), yet its vulnerability to perturbations remains a critical barrier to real-world deployment. As a primary countermeasure, adversarial training improves policy robustness by training the AD agent in the presence of an adversary that deliberately introduces perturbations. Existing approaches typically model the interaction as a zero-sum game with continuous attacks. However, such designs overlook the inherent asymmetry between the agent and the adversary and then fail to reflect the sparsity of safety-critical risks, rendering the achieved robustness inadequate for practical AD scenarios. To address these limitations, we introduce criticality-aware robust RL (CARRL), a novel adversarial training approach for handling sparse, safety-critical risks in autonomous driving. CARRL consists of two interacting components: a risk exposure adversary (REA) and a risk-targeted robust agent (RTRA). We model the interaction between the REA and RTRA as a general-sum game, allowing the REA to focus on exposing safety-critical failures (e.g., collisions) while the RTRA learns to balance safety with driving efficiency. The REA employs a decoupled optimization mechanism to better identify and exploit sparse safety-critical moments under a constrained budget. However, such focused attacks inevitably result in a scarcity of adversarial data. The RTRA copes with this scarcity by jointly leveraging benign and adversarial experiences via a dual replay buffer and enforces policy consistency under perturbations to stabilize behavior. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach reduces the collision rate by at least 22.66% across all cases compared to state-of-the-art baseline methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Robust Driving Control for Autonomous Vehicles: An Intelligent General-sum Constrained Adversarial Reinforcement Learning Approach10 Oct
  2. 2025Sharpening the Spear: Adaptive Expert-Guided Adversarial Attack Against DRL-based Autonomous Driving Policies23 Jun
  3. 2021Targeted Attack on Deep RL-based Autonomous Driving with Learned Visual Patterns16 Sep

Other references · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  5. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  6. 2020Learning to Walk in the Real World with Minimal Human Effortcited by 103
  7. 2019Combining Planning and Deep Reinforcement Learning in Tactical Decision Making for Autonomous Drivingcited by 52
  8. 2024VLM-RL: A Unified Vision Language Models and Reinforcement Learning Framework for Safe Autonomous Drivingcited by 49
  9. 2019Characterizing Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
  10. 2024HAIM-DRL: Enhanced Human-in-the-loop Reinforcement Learning for Safe and Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 31
  11. 2024Research on Autonomous Driving Decision-making Strategies based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  12. 2021Limitations and Improvements of the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM)cited by 15
6 more
  1. 2024Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning Through Adversarial Attacks and Training : A Surveycited by 13
  2. 2023On Data Fabrication in Collaborative Vehicular Perception: Attacks and Countermeasurescited by 11
  3. 2022SoK: Rethinking Sensor Spoofing Attacks against Robotic Vehicles from a Systematic Viewcited by 9
  4. 2025Steerable Adversarial Scenario Generation through Test-Time Preference Alignmentcited by 8
  5. 2024Data Poisoning Attacks in Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 4
  6. 2025Enhancing Security in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ADV-0: Closed-Loop Min-Max Adversarial Training for Long-Tail Robustness in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2022Security of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey
  3. 2026From Attacks to Curricula: Learnability-Guided Adversarial Training for Safe Autonomous Driving
  4. 2021Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning for Improving the Robustness of Multi-agent Autonomous Driving Policies
  5. 2022SafeRL-Kit: Evaluating Efficient Reinforcement Learning Methods for Safe Autonomous Driving
  6. 2024Less is More: A Stealthy and Efficient Adversarial Attack Method for DRL-based Autonomous Driving Policies
  7. 2021Minimizing Safety Interference for Safe and Comfortable Automated Driving with Distributional Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Threat-guided Policy-aware Scene Perturbation for Safe Autonomous Driving with Online Reinforcement Learning