SoK: Rethinking Sensor Spoofing Attacks against Robotic Vehicles from a Systematic View
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robotic Vehicles (RVs) have gained great popularity over the past few years. Meanwhile, they are also demonstrated to be vulnerable to sensor spoofing attacks. Although a wealth of research works have presented various attacks, some key questions remain unanswered: are these existing works complete enough to cover all the sensor spoofing threats? If not, how many attacks are not explored, and how difficult is it to realize them? This paper answers the above questions by comprehensively systematizing the knowledge of sensor spoofing attacks against RVs. Our contributions are threefold. (1) We identify seven common attack paths in an RV system pipeline. We categorize and assess existing spoofing attacks from the perspectives of spoofer property, operation, victim characteristic and attack goal. Based on this systematization, we identify 4 interesting insights about spoofing attack designs. (2) We propose a novel action flow model to systematically describe robotic function executions and unexplored sensor spoofing threats. With this model, we successfully discover 103 spoofing attack vectors, 26 of which have been verified by prior works, while 77 attacks are never considered. (3) We design two novel attack methodologies to verify the feasibility of newly discovered spoofing attack vectors.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 May 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 32
- 2024SafeEmbodAI: a Safety Framework for Mobile Robots in Embodied AI Systemscited by 12
- 2023Security Considerations in AI-Robotics: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 9
- 2024AdvGPS: Adversarial GPS for Multi-Agent Perception Attackcited by 5
- 2025Detection and Recovery of Adversarial Slow-Pose Drift in Offloaded Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 3
- 2026Angel or Demon: Investigating the Plasticity Interventions' Impact on Backdoor Threats in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2024Prepared for the Worst: A Learning-Based Adversarial Attack for Resilience Analysis of the ICP Algorithmcited by 0
- 2026Sparse Threats, Focused Defense: Criticality-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
- 2026Security and Resilience in Autonomous Vehicles: A Proactive Design Approachcited by 0
- 2026Angel or Demon: Investigating the Plasticity Interventions' Impact on Backdoor Threats in Deep Reinforcement Learning14 May 2026
- 2026Security and Resilience in Autonomous Vehicles: A Proactive Design Approach14 Apr 2026
- 2026Sparse Threats, Focused Defense: Criticality-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving5 Jan 2026
- 2025Detection and Recovery of Adversarial Slow-Pose Drift in Offloaded Visual-Inertial Odometry8 Sep 2025
- 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks18 Feb 2025
- 2024SafeEmbodAI: a Safety Framework for Mobile Robots in Embodied AI Systems3 Sep 2024
- 2024Prepared for the Worst: A Learning-Based Adversarial Attack for Resilience Analysis of the ICP Algorithm8 Mar 2024
- 2024AdvGPS: Adversarial GPS for Multi-Agent Perception Attack30 Jan 2024
- 2023Security Considerations in AI-Robotics: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities12 Oct 2023