mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset

arXiv 2212.04972 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2022cs.DL cs.AI cs.CLcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Open peer review is a growing trend in academic publications. Public access to peer review data can benefit both the academic and publishing communities. It also serves as a great support to studies on review comment generation and further to the realization of automated scholarly paper review. However, most of the existing peer review datasets do not provide data that cover the whole peer review process. Apart from this, their data are not diversified enough as the data are mainly collected from the field of computer science. These two drawbacks of the currently available peer review datasets need to be addressed to unlock more opportunities for related studies. In response, we construct MOPRD, a multidisciplinary open peer review dataset. This dataset consists of paper metadata, multiple version manuscripts, review comments, meta-reviews, author's rebuttal letters, and editorial decisions. Moreover, we propose a modular guided review comment generation method based on MOPRD. Experiments show that our method delivers better performance as indicated by both automatic metrics and human evaluation. We also explore other potential applications of MOPRD, including meta-review generation, editorial decision prediction, author rebuttal generation, and scientometric analysis. MOPRD is a strong endorsement for further studies in peer review-related research and other applications.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2022.

Builds on

21 of 58 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  2. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  3. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
  4. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  5. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  6. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  7. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
  8. 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
  9. 2021LongT5: Efficient Text-To-Text Transformer for Long Sequencescited by 232
  10. 2018A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applicationscited by 135
  11. 2021Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?cited by 63
  12. 2021PRIMERA: Pyramid-based Masked Sentence Pre-training for Multi-document Summarizationcited by 62
9 more
  1. 2021MReD: A Meta-Review Dataset for Structure-Controllable Text Generationcited by 42
  2. 2019Argument Mining for Understanding Peer Reviewscited by 41
  3. 2016Neural Speech Recognizer: Acoustic-to-Word LSTM Model for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 33
  4. 2019Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conferencecited by 31
  5. 2021Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challengescited by 21
  6. 2020Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendationcited by 17
  7. 2022Automatic Analysis of Available Source Code of Top Artificial Intelligence Conference Paperscited by 9
  8. 2022ReAct: A Review Comment Dataset for Actionability (and more)cited by 5
  9. 2021COMPARE: A Taxonomy and Dataset of Comparison Discussions in Peer Reviewscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 12; 2026: 14.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewingcited by 62
  2. 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveycited by 59
  3. 2025Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluationcited by 41
  4. 2024Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysiscited by 33
  5. 2025TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Reviewcited by 31
  6. 2025When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Researchcited by 25
  7. 2025ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviewscited by 22
  8. 2025How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?cited by 15
  9. 2025From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Reviewcited by 11
  10. 2025Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferencescited by 10
  11. 2025Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Papercited by 10
  12. 2024PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMscited by 9
20 more
  1. 2025Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Processcited by 8
  2. 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Futurecited by 6
  3. 2025OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 5
  4. 2025Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Modelscited by 5
  5. 2026RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generationcited by 5
  6. 2023The Open Review-Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High-Energy Physicscited by 4
  7. 2026OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessmentcited by 4
  8. 2026Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Reviewcited by 3
  9. 2026Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidancecited by 3
  10. 2024SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Commentscited by 2
  11. 2026FMMD: A multimodal multidisciplinary dataset of open peer reviews from F1000Researchcited by 1
  12. 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation Systemcited by 1
  13. 2026EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Tracescited by 1
  14. 2026LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challengescited by 1
  15. 2026AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verificationcited by 1
  16. 2024ClaimBrush: A Novel Framework for Automated Patent Claim Refinement Based on Large Language Modelscited by 0
  17. 2026Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Timecited by 0
  18. 2026From peer review nuances to best practicescited by 0
  19. 2026SurveyReview: A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluatorscited by 0
  20. 2026Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Reviewcited by 0