mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Device-Native Autonomous Agents for Privacy-Preserving Negotiations

arXiv 2601.00911 ↗First posted 1 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.ETcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated negotiations in insurance and business-to-business (B2B) commerce encounter substantial challenges. Current systems force a trade-off between convenience and privacy by routing sensitive financial data through centralized servers, increasing security risks, and diminishing user trust. This study introduces a device-native autonomous Agentic AI system for privacy-preserving negotiations. The proposed system operates exclusively on user hardware, enabling real-time bargaining while maintaining sensitive constraints locally. It integrates zero-knowledge proofs to ensure privacy and employs distilled world models to support advanced on-device reasoning. The architecture incorporates six technical components within an Agentic AI workflow. Agents autonomously plan negotiation strategies, conduct secure multi-party bargaining, and generate cryptographic audit trails without exposing user data to external servers. The system is evaluated in insurance and B2B procurement scenarios across diverse device configurations. Results show an average success rate of 87 %, a 2.4x reduction in latency relative to cloud baselines, and strong privacy preservation through zero-knowledge proofs. User studies show 27 % higher trust scores when decision trails are available. These findings establish a foundation for trustworthy autonomous agents in privacy-sensitive financial domains.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2026.

Builds on

10 of 24 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
  6. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
  7. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
  8. 2022Scaling up Trustless DNN Inference with Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 31
  9. 2021Are We There Yet? Timing and Floating-Point Attacks on Differential Privacy Systemscited by 8
  10. 2024A Framework for Differential Privacy Against Timing Attackscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agents
  2. 2026AESP: A Human-Sovereign Economic Protocol for AI Agents with Privacy-Preserving Settlement
  3. 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2025Insured Agents: A Decentralized Trust Insurance Mechanism for Agentic Economy
  5. 2026NostrAgent: A Decentralized Identity and Delegation Architecture for Sovereign Agentic Systems
  6. 2026TrustedARI: Towards Trust-Native Agentic Routing Infrastructure for Agentic AI
  7. 2026PAAC: Privacy-Aware Agentic Device-Cloud Collaboration
  8. 2026AI-Native Insurance for Agentic AI: Pricing, Underwriting, and End-to-End Automation