Eliciting Behaviors in Multi-Turn Conversations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying specific and often complex behaviors from large language models (LLMs) in conversational settings is crucial for their evaluation. Recent work proposes novel techniques to find natural language prompts that induce specific behaviors from a target model, yet they are mainly studied in single-turn settings. In this work, we study behavior elicitation in the context of multi-turn conversations. We first offer an analytical framework that categorizes existing methods into three families based on their interactions with the target model: those that use only prior knowledge, those that use offline interactions, and those that learn from online interactions. We then introduce a generalized multi-turn formulation of the online method, unifying single-turn and multi-turn elicitation. We evaluate all three families of methods on automatically generating multi-turn test cases. We investigate the efficiency of these approaches by analyzing the trade-off between the query budget, i.e., the number of interactions with the target model, and the success rate, i.e., the discovery rate of behavior-eliciting inputs. We find that online methods can achieve an average success rate of 45/19/77% with just a few thousand queries over three tasks where static methods from existing multi-turn conversation benchmarks find few or even no failure cases. Our work highlights a novel application of behavior elicitation methods in multi-turn conversation evaluation and the need for the community to move towards dynamic benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.
Builds on
44 of 58 references.
References · 44
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
32 more
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 738
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
- 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
- 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 364
- 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 320
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 288
- 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 247
- 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulationcited by 202
- 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
- 2025MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMscited by 171
- 2015Deep Spatial Autoencoders for Visuomotor Learningcited by 149
- 2024LLM Defenses Are Not Robust to Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks Yetcited by 145
- 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 94
- 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2024LLMs know their vulnerabilities: Uncover Safety Gaps through Natural Distribution Shiftscited by 80
- 2024MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 78
- 2023Are You Sure? Challenging LLMs Leads to Performance Drops in The FlipFlop Experimentcited by 71
- 2024Speak Out of Turn: Safety Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Multi-turn Dialoguecited by 64
- 2020DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment Analysiscited by 63
- 2024Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Testercited by 41
- 2024KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2020Improving Query Efficiency of Black-box Adversarial Attackcited by 34
- 2025MTSA: Multi-turn Safety Alignment for LLMs through Multi-round Red-teamingcited by 31
- 2025BNPO: Beta Normalization Policy Optimizationcited by 28
- 2024Holistic Automated Red Teaming for Large Language Models through Top-Down Test Case Generation and Multi-turn Interactioncited by 25
- 2025SafeDialBench: A Fine-Grained Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues with Diverse Jailbreak Attackscited by 23
- 2025Eliciting Language Model Behaviors with Investigator Agentscited by 21
- 2025Siren: A Learning-Based Multi-Turn Attack Framework for Simulating Real-World Human Jailbreak Behaviorscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use Agentscited by 13
- 2026AI Psychosis: Does Conversational AI Amplify Delusion-Related Language?cited by 5
- 2026Sycophantic Agreement Transfers with Neutral Data via Contrastive Preference Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026BLOOM-WILT: Logit Tilting for Behaviour Elicitation in Automated LLM Auditingcited by 0
- 2026BLOOM-WILT: Logit Tilting for Behaviour Elicitation in Automated LLM Auditing31 Aug 2026
- 2026Sycophantic Agreement Transfers with Neutral Data via Contrastive Preference Optimization31 Aug 2026
- 2026AI Psychosis: Does Conversational AI Amplify Delusion-Related Language?20 Mar 2026
- 2026When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use Agents9 Feb 2026