Agentic AI for Autonomous Defense in Software Supply Chain Security: Beyond Provenance to Vulnerability Mitigation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
The software supply chain attacks are becoming more and more focused on trusted development and delivery procedures, so the conventional post-build integrity mechanisms cannot be used anymore. The available frameworks like SLSA, SBOM and in toto are majorly used to offer provenance and traceability but do not have the capabilities of actively identifying and removing vulnerabilities in software production. The current paper includes an example of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) based on autonomous software supply chain security that combines large language model (LLM)-based reasoning, reinforcement learning (RL), and multi-agent coordination. The suggested system utilizes specialized security agents coordinated with the help of LangChain and LangGraph, communicates with actual CI/CD environments with the Model Context Protocol (MCP), and documents all the observations and actions in a blockchain security ledger to ensure integrity and auditing. Reinforcement learning can be used to achieve adaptive mitigation strategies that consider the balance between security effectiveness and the operational overhead, and LLMs can be used to achieve semantic vulnerability analysis, as well as explainable decisions. This framework is tested based on simulated pipelines, as well as, actual world CI/CD integrations on GitHub Actions and Jenkins, including injection attacks, insecure deserialization, access control violations, and configuration errors. Experimental outcomes indicate better detection accuracy, shorter mitigation latency and reasonable build-time overhead than rule-based, provenance only and RL only baselines. These results show that agentic AI can facilitate the transition to self defending, proactive software supply chains rather than reactive verification ones.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.
Builds on
7 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Seven Security Challenges in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems28 May
- 2025SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems27 Apr
Other references · 5
- 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 246
- 2022Taxonomy of Attacks on Open-Source Software Supply Chainscited by 57
- 2024SoK: Analysis of Software Supply Chain Security by Establishing Secure Design Propertiescited by 5
- 2022Reinforcement Learning for Hardware Security: Opportunities, Developments, and Challengescited by 3
- 2023An Empirically Grounded Reference Architecture for Software Supply Chain Metadata Managementcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SBOMs into Agentic AIBOMs: Schema Extensions, Agentic Orchestration, and Reproducibility Evaluation
- 2026Rising From the Ashes: How Agentic AI is Unblocking Challenges in Cybersecurity
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce
- 2026SOK: A Taxonomy of Attack Vectors and Defense Strategies for Agentic Supply Chain Runtime
- 2025Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
- 2026LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment
- 2026Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance
- 2026Trustworthy AI LLM Scalability Risk Index (LSRI): A Cybersecurity Framework Assessing Agentic-AI Security & Software Model Supply Chain Safety Boosting AI-Generated Malware Defense & Explainability Mitigating Emerging Risks of Generative AI