mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SBOMs into Agentic AIBOMs: Schema Extensions, Agentic Orchestration, and Reproducibility Evaluation

arXiv 2603.10057 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Software supply-chain security requires provenance mechanisms that support reproducibility and vulnerability assessment under dynamic execution conditions. Conventional Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) provide static dependency inventories but cannot capture runtime behaviour, environment drift, or exploitability context. This paper introduces agentic Artificial Intelligence Bills of Materials (AIBOMs), extending SBOMs into active provenance artefacts through autonomous, policy-constrained reasoning. We present an agentic AIBOM framework based on a multi-agent architecture comprising (i) a baseline environment reconstruction agent (MCP), (ii) a runtime dependency and drift-monitoring agent (A2A), and (iii) a policy-aware vulnerability and VEX reasoning agent (AGNTCY). These agents generate contextual exploitability assertions by combining runtime execution evidence, dependency usage, and environmental mitigations with ISO/IEC 20153:2025 Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) v2.0 semantics. Exploitability is expressed via structured VEX assertions rather than enforcement actions. The framework introduces minimal, standards-aligned schema extensions to CycloneDX and SPDX, capturing execution context, dependency evolution, and agent decision provenance while preserving interoperability. Evaluation across heterogeneous analytical workloads demonstrates improved runtime dependency capture, reproducibility fidelity, and stability of vulnerability interpretation compared with established provenance systems, with low computational overhead. Ablation studies confirm that each agent contributes distinct capabilities unavailable through deterministic automation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.

Builds on

1 of 42 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025A Dataset of Software Bill of Materials for Evaluating SBOM Consumption Toolscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Agentic AI for Autonomous Defense in Software Supply Chain Security: Beyond Provenance to Vulnerability Mitigation
  2. 2026AgentRiskBOM: A Risk-Scoping Security Bill of Materials for Agentic AI Systems
  3. 2026Resource-Optimized and Energy-Aware Agentic AI Framework Anchored on Blockchain for Secure Software Supply Chains
  4. 2026Execution-bound advisory automation for agentic AI: a reproducible AIBOM-driven CSAF-VEX framework
  5. 2025AI Bill of Materials and Beyond: Systematizing Security Assurance through the AI Risk Scanning (AIRS) Framework
  6. 2026From Agent Output to Authorized Transition
  7. 2026AgenticVM: Agentic AI for Adaptive Software Vulnerability Management
  8. 2026Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science?