mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Securing the AI Supply Chain: What Can We Learn From Developer-Reported Security Issues and Solutions of AI Projects?

arXiv 2512.23385 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and applications has led to an increasingly complex security landscape. Developers of AI projects must contend not only with traditional software supply chain issues but also with novel, AI-specific security threats. However, little is known about what security issues are commonly encountered and how they are resolved in practice. This gap hinders the development of effective security measures for each component of the AI supply chain. We bridge this gap by conducting an empirical investigation of developer-reported issues and solutions, based on discussions from Hugging Face and GitHub. To identify security-related discussions, we develop a pipeline that combines keyword matching with an optimal fine-tuned distilBERT classifier, which achieved the best performance in our extensive comparison of various deep learning and large language models. This pipeline produces a dataset of 312,868 security discussions, providing insights into the security reporting practices of AI applications and projects. We conduct a thematic analysis of 753 posts sampled from our dataset and uncover a fine-grained taxonomy of 32 security issues and 24 solutions across four themes: (1) System and Software, (2) External Tools and Ecosystem, (3) Model, and (4) Data. We reveal that many security issues arise from the complex dependencies and black-box nature of AI components. Notably, challenges related to Models and Data often lack concrete solutions. Our insights can offer evidence-based guidance for developers and researchers to address real-world security threats across the AI supply chain.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.

Builds on

34 of 89 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  6. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  7. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  8. 2024Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systemscited by 63
  9. 2022SecureBERT: A Domain-Specific Language Model for Cybersecuritycited by 60
  10. 2025LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insightscited by 44
  11. 2021A Survey on Data-driven Software Vulnerability Assessment and Prioritizationcited by 18
  12. 2024Models Are Codes: Towards Measuring Malicious Code Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Model Hubscited by 16
22 more
  1. 2021PatchRNN: A Deep Learning-Based System for Security Patch Identificationcited by 13
  2. 2019Commit2Vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Code Changescited by 12
  3. 2024Deep Learning Model Reuse in the HuggingFace Community: Challenges, Benefit and Trendscited by 12
  4. 2024A Large-Scale Exploit Instrumentation Study of AI/ML Supply Chain Attacks in Hugging Face Modelscited by 12
  5. 2022VulCurator: A Vulnerability-Fixing Commit Detectorcited by 11
  6. 2020PUMiner: Mining Security Posts from Developer Question and Answer Websites with PU Learningcited by 10
  7. 2022Security for Machine Learning-based Software Systems: a survey of threats, practices and challengescited by 9
  8. 2022Threat Assessment in Machine Learning based Systemscited by 9
  9. 2025LLMSecConfig: An LLM-Based Approach for Fixing Software Container Misconfigurationscited by 9
  10. 2023What Do Users Ask in Open-Source AI Repositories? An Empirical Study of GitHub Issuescited by 8
  11. 2023Trust in Software Supply Chains: Blockchain-Enabled SBOM and the AIBOM Futurecited by 8
  12. 2023On the Suitability of Hugging Face Hub for Empirical Studiescited by 8
  13. 2024Software Vulnerability Prediction in Low-Resource Languages: An Empirical Study of CodeBERT and ChatGPTcited by 8
  14. 2024What do we know about Hugging Face? A systematic literature review and quantitative validation of qualitative claimscited by 8
  15. 2024Mitigating Data Imbalance for Software Vulnerability Assessment: Does Data Augmentation Help?cited by 6
  16. 2024Automated Code-centric Software Vulnerability Assessment: How Far Are We? An Empirical Study in C/C++cited by 6
  17. 2024Automatic Data Labeling for Software Vulnerability Prediction Models: How Far Are We?cited by 6
  18. 2021How Do Developers Deal with Security Issue Reports on GitHub?cited by 4
  19. 2023Security Defect Detection via Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack and Qt Communitiescited by 4
  20. 2024Documenting Ethical Considerations in Open Source AI Modelscited by 4
  21. 2025A Rusty Link in the AI Supply Chain: Detecting Evil Configurations in Model Repositoriescited by 2
  22. 2024Adversarial Robustness of Open-source Text Classification Models and Fine-Tuning Chainscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.