mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NEMO-4-PAYPAL: Leveraging NVIDIA's Nemo Framework for empowering PayPal's Commerce Agent

arXiv 2512.21578 ↗First posted 25 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

We present the development and optimization of PayPal's Commerce Agent, powered by NEMO-4-PAYPAL, a multi-agent system designed to revolutionize agentic commerce on the PayPal platform. Through our strategic partnership with NVIDIA, we leveraged the NeMo Framework for LLM model fine-tuning to enhance agent performance. Specifically, we optimized the Search and Discovery agent by replacing our base model with a fine-tuned Nemotron small language model (SLM). We conducted comprehensive experiments using the llama3.1-nemotron-nano-8B-v1 architecture, training LoRA-based models through systematic hyperparameter sweeps across learning rates, optimizers (Adam, AdamW), cosine annealing schedules, and LoRA ranks. Our contributions include: (1) the first application of NVIDIA's NeMo Framework to commerce-specific agent optimization, (2) LLM powered fine-tuning strategy for retrieval-focused commerce tasks, (3) demonstration of significant improvements in latency and cost while maintaining agent quality, and (4) a scalable framework for multi-agent system optimization in production e-commerce environments. Our results demonstrate that the fine-tuned Nemotron SLM effectively resolves the key performance issue in the retrieval component, which represents over 50% of total agent response time, while maintaining or enhancing overall system performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2025.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  2. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  3. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 508
  4. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
  5. 2023Query Expansion by Prompting Large Language Modelscited by 56
  6. 2023Rethinking E-Commerce Searchcited by 2
  7. 2025LESER: Learning to Expand via Search Engine-feedback Reinforcement in e-Commercecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025OptAgent: Optimizing Query Rewriting for E-commerce via Multi-Agent Simulation
  2. 2026Iterating Toward Better Search: A Two-Agent Simulation Framework for Evaluating Agentic Search Architectures in E-Commerce
  3. 2025NVIDIA Nemotron 3: Efficient and Open Intelligence
  4. 2026AgenticPay: A Multi-Agent LLM Negotiation System for Buyer-Seller Transactions
  5. 2025ShoppingBench: A Real-World Intent-Grounded Shopping Benchmark for LLM-based Agents
  6. 2026ShopSimulator: Evaluating and Exploring RL-Driven LLM Agent for Shopping Assistants
  7. 2025HiveMind: Contribution-Guided Online Prompt Optimization of LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2025DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents