Statistical and computational challenges in ranking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of ranking n experts according to their abilities, based on the correctness of their answers to d questions. This is modeled by the so-called crowd-sourcing model, where the answer of expert i on question k is modeled by a random entry, parametrized by Mi,k which is increasing linearly with the expected quality of the answer. To enable the unambiguous ranking of the experts by ability, several assumptions on M are available in the literature. We consider here the general isotonic crowd-sourcing model, where M is assumed to be isotonic up to an unknown permutation π^* of the experts - namely, M_π*-1(i),k ≥ M_π*-1(i+1),k for any i∈ [n-1], k ∈ [d]. Then, ranking experts amounts to constructing an estimator of π^*. In particular, we investigate here the existence of statistically optimal and computationally efficient procedures and we describe recent results that disprove the existence of computational-statistical gaps for this problem. To provide insights on the key ideas, we start by discussing simpler and yet related sub-problems, namely sub-matrix detection and estimation. This corresponds to specific instances of the ranking problem where the matrix M is constrained to be of the form λ mathbf 1S× T where Ssubset [n], Tsubset [d]. This model has been extensively studied. We provide an overview of the results and proof techniques for this problem with a particular emphasis on the computational lower bounds based on low-degree polynomial methods. Then, we build upon this instrumental sub-problem to discuss existing results and algorithmic ideas for the general ranking problem.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2025.
Builds on
42 of 64 references.
References · 42
- 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
- 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
- 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 82
- 2015Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependencecited by 59
- 2017The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structurescited by 54
- 2020Statistical Query Algorithms and Low-Degree Tests Are Almost Equivalentcited by 51
- 2020Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakagecited by 50
- 2019Subexponential-Time Algorithms for Sparse PCAcited by 41
- 2020Computational Barriers to Estimation from Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 38
- 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
- 2015Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issuescited by 32
- 2022The Franz-Parisi Criterion and Computational Trade-offs in High Dimensional Statisticscited by 31
30 more
- 2014Statistical-Computational Tradeoffs in Planted Problems and Submatrix Localization with a Growing Number of Clusters and Submatricescited by 29
- 2014Computational Lower Bounds for Community Detection on Random Graphscited by 21
- 2015Information Limits for Recovering a Hidden Communitycited by 18
- 2017Minimax Rates and Efficient Algorithms for Noisy Sortingcited by 15
- 2019Universality of Computational Lower Bounds for Submatrix Detectioncited by 13
- 2015Computational and Statistical Boundaries for Submatrix Localization in a Large Noisy Matrixcited by 12
- 2016A Permutation-based Model for Crowd Labeling: Optimal Estimation and Robustnesscited by 12
- 2018Uncoupled isotonic regression via minimum Wasserstein deconvolutioncited by 12
- 2025Computational Complexity of Statistics: New Insights from Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 12
- 2013Community Detection in Sparse Random Networkscited by 11
- 2016Optimal Rates of Statistical Seriationcited by 10
- 2019Optimal Permutation Recovery in Permuted Monotone Matrix Modelcited by 10
- 2015Finding One Community in a Sparse Graphcited by 8
- 2024Tensor cumulants for statistical inference on invariant distributionscited by 8
- 2023Is Planted Coloring Easier than Planted Clique?cited by 7
- 2025Sharp Phase Transitions in Estimation with Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 7
- 2016Feeling the Bern: Adaptive Estimators for Bernoulli Probabilities of Pairwise Comparisonscited by 6
- 2022Average-Case Complexity of Tensor Decomposition for Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 6
- 2023Active Ranking of Experts Based on their Performances in Many Taskscited by 6
- 2023Computational Lower Bounds for Graphon Estimation via Low-degree Polynomialscited by 6
- 2025Low-degree lower bounds via almost orthonormal basescited by 5
- 2015Submatrix localization via message passingcited by 4
- 2018Towards Optimal Estimation of Bivariate Isotonic Matrices with Unknown Permutationscited by 4
- 2023Detection-Recovery Gap for Planted Dense Cyclescited by 4
- 2025Stochastic block models with many communities and the Kesten--Stigum boundcited by 4
- 2025Computational lower bounds in latent models: clustering, sparse-clustering, biclusteringcited by 4
- 2018Breaking the 1/√n Barrier: Faster Rates for Permutation-based Models in Polynomial Timecited by 3
- 2024Counting Stars is Constant-Degree Optimal For Detecting Any Planted Subgraphcited by 2
- 2024Optimal level set estimation for non-parametric tournament and crowdsourcing problemscited by 1
- 2025Optimal community detection in dense bipartite graphscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.