Low-degree lower bounds via almost orthonormal bases
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-degree polynomials have emerged as a powerful paradigm for providing evidence of statistical-computational gaps across a variety of high-dimensional statistical models [Wein25]. For detection problems -- where the goal is to test a planted distribution mathbbP' against a null distribution mathbbP with independent components -- the standard approach is to bound the advantage using an mathbbL2(mathbbP)-orthonormal family of polynomials. However, this method breaks down for estimation tasks or more complex testing problems where mathbbP has some planted structures, so that no simple mathbbL2(mathbbP)-orthogonal polynomial family is available. To address this challenge, several technical workarounds have been proposed [SW22,SW25], though their implementation can be delicate. In this work, we propose a more direct proof strategy. Focusing on random graph models, we construct a basis of polynomials that is almost orthonormal under mathbbP, in precisely those regimes where statistical-computational gaps arise. This almost orthonormal basis not only yields a direct route to establishing low-degree lower bounds, but also allows us to explicitly identify the polynomials that optimize the low-degree criterion. This, in turn, provides insights into the design of optimal polynomial-time algorithms. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by recovering known low-degree lower bounds, and establishing new ones for problems such as hidden subcliques, stochastic block models, and seriation models.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025Phase Transition for Stochastic Block Model with more than √n Communities (II)cited by 4
- 2025Phase Transition for Stochastic Block Model with more than √n Communitiescited by 3
- 2026Algorithmic Contiguity from Low-Degree Heuristic II: Predicting Detection-Recovery Gapscited by 1
- 2026Sharp Low-Degree Thresholds for Planted-vs-Planted Testingcited by 1
- 2025Statistical-computational gap in multiple Gaussian graph alignmentcited by 0
- 2025Statistical and computational challenges in rankingcited by 0
- 2026Low-degree Lower bounds for clustering in moderate dimensioncited by 0
- 2026Two-Sample Testing for Random Graphs without Vertex Correspondencecited by 0
- 2026Two-Sample Testing for Random Graphs without Vertex Correspondence5 Oct 2026
- 2026Sharp Low-Degree Thresholds for Planted-vs-Planted Testing3 Jun 2026
- 2026Algorithmic Contiguity from Low-Degree Heuristic II: Predicting Detection-Recovery Gaps19 Apr 2026
- 2026Low-degree Lower bounds for clustering in moderate dimension26 Feb 2026
- 2025Statistical and computational challenges in ranking24 Dec 2025
- 2025Statistical-computational gap in multiple Gaussian graph alignment29 Nov 2025
- 2025Phase Transition for Stochastic Block Model with more than √n Communities (II)26 Nov 2025
- 2025Phase Transition for Stochastic Block Model with more than √n Communities19 Sep 2025