mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Counting Stars is Constant-Degree Optimal For Detecting Any Planted Subgraph

arXiv 2403.17766 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2024math.ST cs.CC cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the computational limits of the following general hypothesis testing problem. Let H=Hn be an arbitrary undirected graph on n vertices. We study the detection task between a ``null'' ErdHos-R'enyi random graph G(n,p) and a ``planted'' random graph which is the union of G(n,p) together with a random copy of H=Hn. Our notion of planted model is a generalization of a plethora of recently studied models initiated with the study of the planted clique model (Jerrum 1992), which corresponds to the special case where H is a k-clique and p=1/2. Over the last decade, several papers have studied the power of low-degree polynomials for limited choices of H's in the above task. In this work, we adopt a unifying perspective and characterize the power of constant degree polynomials for the detection task, when H=Hn is any arbitrary graph and for any p=Omega(1). Perhaps surprisingly, we prove that the optimal constant degree polynomial is always given by simply counting stars in the input random graph. As a direct corollary, we conclude that the class of constant-degree polynomials is only able to ``sense'' the degree distribution of the planted graph H, and no other graph theoretic property of it.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.