mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Multi-fidelity Double-Delta Wing Dataset and Empirical Scaling Laws for GNN-based Aerodynamic Field Surrogate

arXiv 2512.20941 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AI physics.flu-dyncited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven surrogate models are increasingly adopted to accelerate vehicle design. However, open-source multi-fidelity datasets and empirical guidelines linking dataset size to model performance remain limited. This study investigates the relationship between training data size and prediction accuracy for a graph neural network (GNN) based surrogate model for aerodynamic field prediction. We release an open-source, multi-fidelity aerodynamic dataset for double-delta wings, comprising 2448 flow snapshots across 272 geometries evaluated at angles of attack from 11 (degree) to 19 (degree) at Ma=0.3 using both Vortex Lattice Method (VLM) and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solvers. The geometries are generated using a nested Saltelli sampling scheme to support future dataset expansion and variance-based sensitivity analysis. Using this dataset, we conduct a preliminary empirical scaling study of the MF-VortexNet surrogate by constructing six training datasets with sizes ranging from 40 to 1280 snapshots and training models with 0.1 to 2.4 million parameters under a fixed training budget. We find that the test error decreases with data size with a power-law exponent of -0.6122, indicating efficient data utilization. Based on this scaling law, we estimate that the optimal sampling density is approximately eight samples per dimension in a d-dimensional design space. The results also suggest improved data utilization efficiency for larger surrogate models, implying a potential trade-off between dataset generation cost and model training budget.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2025.

Builds on

19 of 59 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  4. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  6. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  7. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 840
  8. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  9. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  10. 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
  11. 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 141
  12. 2022Cramming: Training a Language Model on a Single GPU in One Daycited by 81
7 more
  1. 2021How to Train BERT with an Academic Budgetcited by 80
  2. 2025AB-UPT: Scaling Neural CFD Surrogates for High-Fidelity Automotive Aerodynamics Simulations via Anchored-Branched Universal Physics Transformerscited by 49
  3. 2024On the Scalability of GNNs for Molecular Graphscited by 36
  4. 2025DoMINO: A Decomposable Multi-scale Iterative Neural Operator for Modeling Large Scale Engineering Simulationscited by 26
  5. 2024Aero-Nef: Neural Fields for Rapid Aircraft Aerodynamics Simulationscited by 24
  6. 2024Towards Neural Scaling Laws on Graphscited by 13
  7. 2025Scaling Laws of Graph Neural Networks for Atomistic Materials Modelingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.