mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

D2Pruner: Debiased Importance and Structural Diversity for MLLM Token Pruning

arXiv 2512.19443 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 6

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Processing long visual token sequences poses a significant computational burden on Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). While token pruning offers a path to acceleration, we find that current methods, while adequate for general understanding, catastrophically fail on fine-grained localization tasks. We attribute this failure to the inherent flaws of the two prevailing strategies: importance-based methods suffer from a strong positional bias, an inherent model artifact that distracts from semantic content, while diversity-based methods exhibit structural blindness, disregarding the user's prompt and spatial redundancy. To address this, we introduce D2Pruner, a framework that rectifies these issues by uniquely combining debiased importance with a structural pruning mechanism. Our method first secures a core set of the most critical tokens as pivots based on a debiased attention score. It then performs a Maximal Independent Set (MIS) selection on the remaining tokens, which are modeled on a hybrid graph where edges signify spatial proximity and semantic similarity. This process iteratively preserves the most important and available token while removing its neighbors, ensuring that the supplementary tokens are chosen to maximize importance and diversity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that D2Pruner has exceptional efficiency and fidelity. Applied to LLaVA-1.5-7B for general understanding tasks, it reduces FLOPs by 74.2% while retaining 99.2% of its original performance. Furthermore, in challenging localization benchmarks with InternVL-2.5-8B, it maintains 85.7% performance at a 90% token reduction rate, marking a significant advancement with up to 63. 53% improvement over existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models: Are We Solving the Right Problem?17 Feb
  2. 2025Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More17 Feb
  3. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct

Other references · 16

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  4. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
  5. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  6. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  7. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  8. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  9. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  10. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,573
  11. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  12. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
4 more
  1. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,114
  2. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
  3. 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
  4. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 793

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026IDPruner: Harmonizing Importance and Diversity in Visual Token Pruning for MLLMs
  2. 2026SinkPruner: Sink-Free Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2026S2Prune: Spatially Structured Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2025Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs
  5. 2026OTPrune: Distribution-Aligned Visual Token Pruning via Optimal Transport
  6. 2025Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retention
  7. 2026Capturing Token Tendencies for Training-Free Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models
  8. 2025What Kind of Visual Tokens Do We Need? Training-free Visual Token Pruning for Multi-modal Large Language Models from the Perspective of Graph