mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Messages, Not Tokens: Grounded Coresets for Faithful VLM Compression

arXiv 2608.02134 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern vision language models (VLMs) turn high-resolution images into long sequences of visual tokens. Every token traverses the language decoder and persists in its prompt KV cache, inflating inference cost and motivating aggressive visual compression. Existing score-based methods assign each token an independent importance score and retain the Top-K. However, text queries consume collective, signed attention messages from the visual population, not isolated patches. Consequently, equally sized Top-K sets can repeatedly cover one salient region, omit sparse but complementary evidence and discard information carried by the removed population. We therefore formulate faithful visual compression as constructing a compact coreset for decoder messages, and introduce our training-free Grounded Message Coreset Pruning (GMC) which jointly allocates support across query-grounded, appearance, and coordinate-aware evidence, then transports discarded states into selected representatives at their original multimodal positions before physical compaction and native attention resume. This decomposes faithful compression into two coupled components, including selecting carriers that cover the required message modes and realizing the signed population message on those carriers. We further derive bounds connecting their errors to signed-message distortion, visual innovation, and candidate-margin stability. Experiments across multiple VLM families and diverse benchmarks demonstrate strong performance, with GMC-H2 retaining 97.78% Full-relative mean capability on Qwen2.5-VL-7B using 80.2% fewer visual tokens, while GMC-L16 reaches 100.36%. Controlled interventions verify that collective support and population realization jointly drive these gains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026DocPrune:Efficient Document Question Answering via Background, Question, and Comprehension-aware Token Pruning24 Apr
  2. 2026HAWK: Head Importance-Aware Visual Token Pruning in Multimodal Models9 Apr
  3. 2026ApET: Approximation-Error Guided Token Compression for Efficient VLMs23 Feb
  4. 2025D2Pruner: Debiased Importance and Structural Diversity for MLLM Token Pruning22 Dec
  5. 2025VLM-Pruner: Buffering for Spatial Sparsity in an Efficient VLM Centrifugal Token Pruning Paradigm2 Dec
  6. 2025MMTok: Multimodal Coverage Maximization for Efficient Inference of VLMs25 Aug
  7. 2025VFlowOpt: A Token Pruning Framework for LMMs with Visual Information Flow-Guided Optimization7 Aug
  8. 2025Rethinking Visual Token Reduction in LVLMs Under Cross-Modal Misalignment27 Jun
  9. 2025Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs12 Jun
  10. 2025Balanced Token Pruning: Accelerating Vision Language Models Beyond Local Optimization28 May
  11. 2025DivPrune: Diversity-based Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Models4 Mar
  12. 2025Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More17 Feb
4 more
  1. 2024Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs2 Dec
  2. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
  3. 2024Fit and Prune: Fast and Training-free Visual Token Pruning for Multi-modal Large Language Models16 Sep
  4. 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models11 Mar

Other references · 8

  1. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  2. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  3. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  4. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
  5. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  6. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
  7. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
  8. 2025When Token Pruning is Worse than Random: Understanding Visual Token Information in VLLMscited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AsymVLM: Asymmetric Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference
  2. 2026Prune Redundancy, Preserve Essence: Vision Token Compression in VLMs via Synergistic Importance-Diversity
  3. 2024VL-Cache: Sparsity and Modality-Aware KV Cache Compression for Vision-Language Model Inference Acceleration
  4. 2025A Glimpse to Compress: Dynamic Visual Token Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Hybrid Token Compression for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026LRCP: Low-Rank Compressibility Guided Visual Token Pruning for Efficient LVLMs
  7. 2025SparseVILA: Decoupling Visual Sparsity for Efficient VLM Inference
  8. 2026VisCo: Leveraging Large Language Models as Intrinsic Encoders for Visual Token Compression