Cross-modal Counterfactual Explanations: Uncovering Decision Factors and Dataset Biases in Subjective Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Concept-driven counterfactuals explain decisions of classifiers by altering the model predictions through semantic changes. In this paper, we present a novel approach that leverages cross-modal decompositionality and image-specific concepts to create counterfactual scenarios expressed in natural language. We apply the proposed interpretability framework, termed Decompose and Explain (DeX), to the challenging domain of image privacy decisions, which are contextual and subjective. This application enables the quantification of the differential contributions of key scene elements to the model prediction. We identify relevant decision factors via a multi-criterion selection mechanism that considers both image similarity for minimal perturbations and decision confidence to prioritize impactful changes. This approach evaluates and compares diverse explanations, and assesses the interdependency and mutual influence among explanatory properties. By leveraging image-specific concepts, DeX generates image-grounded, sparse explanations, yielding significant improvements over the state of the art. Importantly, DeX operates as a training-free framework, offering high flexibility. Results show that DeX not only uncovers the principal contributing factors influencing subjective decisions, but also identifies underlying dataset biases allowing for targeted mitigation strategies to improve fairness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2025.
Builds on
38 of 54 references.
References · 38
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
- 2021DiffusionCLIP: Text-Guided Diffusion Models for Robust Image Manipulationcited by 640
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
26 more
- 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
- 2020StyleSpace Analysis: Disentangled Controls for StyleGAN Image Generationcited by 331
- 2018An efficient framework for learning sentence representationscited by 197
- 2020pymoo: Multi-objective Optimization in Pythoncited by 196
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2021Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpacecited by 122
- 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
- 2020Parametric UMAP embeddings for representation and semi-supervised learningcited by 103
- 2017Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Imagescited by 101
- 2022Diffusion Visual Counterfactual Explanationscited by 96
- 2022Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Explanationscited by 79
- 2023Open-Set Image Tagging with Multi-Grained Text Supervisioncited by 67
- 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
- 2021Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanationscited by 56
- 2023Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Modelscited by 48
- 2023Adversarial Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 47
- 2023LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Imagescited by 46
- 2023COCO-Counterfactuals: Automatically Constructed Counterfactual Examples for Image-Text Pairscited by 39
- 2024OmniBind: Large-scale Omni Multimodal Representation via Binding Spacescited by 38
- 2022OCTET: Object-aware Counterfactual Explanationscited by 28
- 2023Text-to-Image Models for Counterfactual Explanations: a Black-Box Approachcited by 28
- 2023Zero-shot Model Diagnosiscited by 23
- 2020Analogies minus analogy test: measuring regularities in word embeddingscited by 17
- 2024Image-guided topic modeling for interpretable privacy classificationcited by 4
- 2024Unsupervised Model Diagnosiscited by 4
- 2025SafetyPairs: Isolating Safety Critical Image Features with Counterfactual Image Generationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.