mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PIPCFR: Pseudo-outcome Imputation with Post-treatment Variables for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation

arXiv 2512.18737 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The estimation of individual treatment effects (ITE) focuses on predicting the outcome changes that result from a change in treatment. A fundamental challenge in observational data is that while we need to infer outcome differences under alternative treatments, we can only observe each individual's outcome under a single treatment. Existing approaches address this limitation either by training with inferred pseudo-outcomes or by creating matched instance pairs. However, recent work has largely overlooked the potential impact of post-treatment variables on the outcome. This oversight prevents existing methods from fully capturing outcome variability, resulting in increased variance in counterfactual predictions. This paper introduces Pseudo-outcome Imputation with Post-treatment Variables for Counterfactual Regression (PIPCFR), a novel approach that incorporates post-treatment variables to improve pseudo-outcome imputation. We analyze the challenges inherent in utilizing post-treatment variables and establish a novel theoretical bound for ITE risk that explicitly connects post-treatment variables to ITE estimation accuracy. Unlike existing methods that ignore these variables or impose restrictive assumptions, PIPCFR learns effective representations that preserve informative components while mitigating bias. Empirical evaluations on both real-world and simulated datasets demonstrate that PIPCFR achieves significantly lower ITE errors compared to existing methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2025.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  3. 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 410
  4. 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 332
  5. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 329
  6. 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
  7. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  8. 2013Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 216
  9. 2020Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 78
  10. 2021On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 75
  11. 2018Perfect Match: A Simple Method for Learning Representations For Counterfactual Inference With Neural Networkscited by 56
  12. 2018DeepMatch: Balancing Deep Covariate Representations for Causal Inference Using Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
7 more
  1. 2023Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 32
  2. 2021A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation With Deep Latent Variable Modelscited by 29
  3. 2023Causal Inference with Conditional Front-Door Adjustment and Identifiable Variational Autoencodercited by 17
  4. 2020Long-Term Effect Estimation with Surrogate Representationcited by 15
  5. 2023The Representation Jensen-Shannon Divergencecited by 9
  6. 2022Finding and Listing Front-door Adjustment Setscited by 6
  7. 2024PairNet: Training with Observed Pairs to Estimate Individual Treatment Effectcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.