PROVEX: Enhancing SOC Analyst Trust with Explainable Provenance-Based IDS
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern intrusion detection systems (IDS) leverage graph neural networks (GNNs) to detect malicious activity in system provenance data, but their decisions often remain a black box to analysts. This paper presents a comprehensive XAI framework designed to bridge the trust gap in Security Operations Centers (SOCs) by making graph-based detection transparent. We implement this framework on top of KAIROS, a state-of-the-art temporal graph-based IDS, though our design is applicable to any temporal graph-based detector with minimal adaptation. The complete codebase is available at https://github.com/devang1304/provex.git. We augment the detection pipeline with post-hoc explanations that highlight why an alert was triggered, identifying key causal subgraphs and events. We adapt three GNN explanation methods - GraphMask, GNNExplainer, and a variational temporal GNN explainer (VA-TGExplainer) - to the temporal provenance context. These tools output human-interpretable representations of anomalous behavior, including important edges and uncertainty estimates. Our contributions focus on the practical integration of these explainers, addressing challenges in memory management and reproducibility. We demonstrate our framework on the DARPA CADETS Engagement 3 dataset and show that it produces concise window-level explanations for detected attacks. Our evaluation reveals that the explainers preserve the TGNN's decisions with high fidelity, surfacing critical edges such as malicious file interactions and anomalous netflows. The average explanation overhead is 3-5 seconds per event. By providing insight into the model's reasoning, our framework aims to improve analyst trust and triage speed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2025.
Builds on
13 of 16 references.
References · 13
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
- 2020Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Networkcited by 426
- 2021On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorationscited by 281
- 2020XGNN: Towards Model-Level Explanations of Graph Neural Networkscited by 211
- 2020Interpreting Graph Neural Networks for NLP With Differentiable Edge Maskingcited by 153
- 2020UNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threatscited by 53
- 2018HOLMES: Real-time APT Detection through Correlation of Suspicious Information Flowscited by 43
- 2016Fast Memory-efficient Anomaly Detection in Streaming Heterogeneous Graphscited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.