Large Language Models for Automatic Detection of Sensitive Topics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sensitive information detection is crucial in content moderation to maintain safe online communities. Assisting in this traditionally manual process could relieve human moderators from overwhelming and tedious tasks, allowing them to focus solely on flagged content that may pose potential risks. Rapidly advancing large language models (LLMs) are known for their capability to understand and process natural language and so present a potential solution to support this process. This study explores the capabilities of five LLMs for detecting sensitive messages in the mental well-being domain within two online datasets and assesses their performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, and consistency. Our findings indicate that LLMs have the potential to be integrated into the moderation workflow as a convenient and precise detection tool. The best-performing model, GPT-4o, achieved an average accuracy of 99.5% and an F1-score of 0.99. We discuss the advantages and potential challenges of using LLMs in the moderation workflow and suggest that future research should address the ethical considerations of utilising this technology.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.
Builds on
7 of 58 references.
References · 7
- 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 176
- 2016Exploring the Limits of Language Modelingcited by 172
- 2023Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversationscited by 88
- 2023Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Using Large Language Model-based Conversational Agents for Mental Well-being Supportcited by 75
- 2024If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4cited by 38
- 2024Can Large Language Models Understand Context?cited by 26
- 2017Triaging Content Severity in Online Mental Health Forumscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.