mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

meval: A Statistical Toolbox for Fine-Grained Model Performance Analysis

arXiv 2512.17409 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025cs.LG stat.AP stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Analyzing machine learning model performance stratified by patient and recording properties is becoming the accepted norm and often yields crucial insights about important model failure modes. Performing such analyses in a statistically rigorous manner is non-trivial, however. Appropriate performance metrics must be selected that allow for valid comparisons between groups of different sample sizes and base rates; metric uncertainty must be determined and multiple comparisons be corrected for, in order to assess whether any observed differences may be purely due to chance; and in the case of intersectional analyses, mechanisms must be implemented to find the most `interesting' subgroups within combinatorially many subgroup combinations. We here present a statistical toolbox that addresses these challenges and enables practitioners to easily yet rigorously assess their models for potential subgroup performance disparities. While broadly applicable, the toolbox is specifically designed for medical imaging applications. The analyses provided by the toolbox are illustrated in two case studies, one in skin lesion malignancy classification on the ISIC2020 dataset and one in chest X-ray-based disease classification on the MIMIC-CXR dataset.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

19 of 46 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  2. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  3. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 309
  4. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  5. 2018Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learningcited by 157
  6. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  7. 2020A Patient-Centric Dataset of Images and Metadata for Identifying Melanomas Using Clinical Contextcited by 146
  8. 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 101
  9. 2023Fairlearn: Assessing and Improving Fairness of AI Systemscited by 74
  10. 2022Better Uncertainty Calibration via Proper Scores for Classification and Beyondcited by 65
  11. 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
  12. 2022Detecting Shortcuts in Medical Images -- A Case Study in Chest X-rayscited by 20
7 more
  1. 2023Statistical Inference for Fairness Auditingcited by 20
  2. 2016Identifying Significant Predictive Bias in Classifierscited by 15
  3. 2024Slicing Through Bias: Explaining Performance Gaps in Medical Image Analysis using Slice Discovery Methodscited by 14
  4. 2023Are Sex-based Physiological Differences the Cause of Gender Bias for Chest X-ray Diagnosis?cited by 13
  5. 2023On (assessing) the fairness of risk score modelscited by 12
  6. 2023Towards unraveling calibration biases in medical image analysiscited by 8
  7. 2025Understanding challenges to the interpretation of disaggregated evaluations of algorithmic fairnesscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.