mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Control with Large Language Models for Language-Guided Spatial Tasks

arXiv 2512.17321 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025cs.ROcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although large language models (LLMs) have recently become effective tools for language-conditioned control in embodied systems, instability, slow convergence, and hallucinated actions continue to limit their direct application to continuous control. A modular neuro-symbolic control framework that clearly distinguishes between low-level motion execution and high-level semantic reasoning is proposed in this work. While a lightweight neural delta controller performs bounded, incremental actions in continuous space, a locally deployed LLM interprets symbolic tasks. We assess the suggested method in a planar manipulation setting with spatial relations between objects specified by language. Numerous tasks and local language models, such as Mistral, Phi, and LLaMA-3.2, are used in extensive experiments to compare LLM-only control, neural-only control, and the suggested LLM+DL framework. In comparison to LLM-only baselines, the results show that the neuro-symbolic integration consistently increases both success rate and efficiency, achieving average step reductions exceeding 70% and speedups of up to 8.83x while remaining robust to language model quality. The suggested framework enhances interpretability, stability, and generalization without any need of reinforcement learning or costly rollouts by controlling the LLM to symbolic outputs and allocating uninterpreted execution to a neural controller trained on artificial geometric data. These outputs show empirically that neuro-symbolic decomposition offers a scalable and principled way to integrate language understanding with ongoing control, this approach promotes the creation of dependable and effective language-guided embodied systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Learning Neuro-symbolic Programs for Language Guided Robot Manipulation
  2. 2026The Price Is Not Right: Neuro-Symbolic Methods Outperform VLAs on Structured Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks with Significantly Lower Energy Consumption
  3. 2026From Local Corrections to Generalized Skills: Improving Neuro-Symbolic Policies with MEMO
  4. 2023Dynamic Planning with a LLM
  5. 2026From Language to Action: Can LLM-Based Agents Be Used for Embodied Robot Cognition?
  6. 2026Towards Neuro-Symbolic Procedural Reasoning for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Manipulation
  7. 2026Build on Priors: Vision--Language--Guided Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning for Data-Efficient Real-World Robot Manipulation
  8. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models