mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Local Corrections to Generalized Skills: Improving Neuro-Symbolic Policies with MEMO

arXiv 2603.04560 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026cs.ROcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent works use a neuro-symbolic framework for general manipulation policies. The advantage of this framework is that -- by applying off-the-shelf vision and language models -- the robot can break complex tasks down into semantic subtasks. However, the fundamental bottleneck is that the robot needs skills to ground these subtasks into embodied motions. Skills can take many forms (e.g., trajectory snippets, motion primitives, coded functions), but regardless of their form skills act as a constraint. The high-level policy can only ground its language reasoning through the available skills; if the robot cannot generate the right skill for the current task, its policy will fail. We propose to address this limitation -- and dynamically expand the robot's skills -- by leveraging user feedback. When a robot fails, humans can intuitively explain what went wrong (e.g., ``no, go higher''). While a simple approach is to recall this exact text the next time the robot faces a similar situation, we hypothesize that by collecting, clustering, and re-phrasing natural language corrections across multiple users and tasks, we can synthesize more general text guidance and coded skill templates. Applying this hypothesis we develop Memory Enhanced Manipulation (MEMO). MEMO builds and maintains a retrieval-augmented skillbook gathered from human feedback and task successes. At run time, MEMO retrieves relevant text and code from this skillbook, enabling the robot's policy to generate new skills while reasoning over multi-task human feedback. Our experiments demonstrate that using MEMO to aggregate local feedback into general skill templates enables generalization to novel tasks where existing baselines fall short. See supplemental material here: https://collab.me.vt.edu/memo

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Learning Neuro-symbolic Programs for Language Guided Robot Manipulation
  2. 2024Yell At Your Robot: Improving On-the-Fly from Language Corrections
  3. 2026Build on Priors: Vision--Language--Guided Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning for Data-Efficient Real-World Robot Manipulation
  4. 2024Natural Language as Policies: Reasoning for Coordinate-Level Embodied Control with LLMs
  5. 2025LaGEA: Language Guided Embodied Agents for Robotic Manipulation
  6. 2023Bridging Language and Action: A Survey of Language-Conditioned Robot Manipulation
  7. 2026Bounding Boxes as Goals: Language-Conditioned Grasping via Neuro-Symbolic Planning
  8. 2023Scaling Up and Distilling Down: Language-Guided Robot Skill Acquisition