mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DiffeoMorph: Learning to Morph 3D Shapes Using Differentiable Agent-Based Simulations

arXiv 2512.17129 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.MA cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biological systems can form complex three-dimensional structures through the collective behavior of agents that share a common update rule and operate without central control. How such distributed control gives rise to precise global patterns remains a central question not only in developmental biology but also in distributed robotics, programmable matter, and multi-agent learning. Here, we introduce DiffeoMorph, an end-to-end differentiable framework for learning a morphogenesis protocol that guides a population of agents to morph into a target 3D shape. Each agent updates its position and internal state using an SE(3)-equivariant graph neural network, based on its own internal state and signals received from other agents. To train this system, we introduce a new shape-matching loss based on 3D Zernike polynomials, which compares the predicted and target shapes as continuous spatial distributions, not as discrete point clouds, and is invariant to agent ordering, number of agents, and global orientation. To achieve rotation invariance while preserving reflection sensitivity, we include an alignment step that optimally rotates the predicted Zernike spectrum to match the target before computing the loss. We perform benchmarking to establish the advantages of our shape-matching loss over other standard distance metrics for shape comparison tasks. We then demonstrate that DiffeoMorph can form a range of complex shapes from minimally patterned initial conditions. DiffeoMorph provides a general framework for learning distributed control strategies for morphogenesis, swarm robotics, and programmable self-assembly.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.

Builds on

24 of 93 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  4. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  5. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  6. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  7. 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
  8. 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 965
  9. 2018From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communitiescited by 385
  10. 2019Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 321
  11. 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 313
  12. 2022On Neural Differential Equationscited by 268
12 more
  1. 2020Design Space for Graph Neural Networkscited by 182
  2. 2019Neural Stochastic Differential Equations: Deep Latent Gaussian Models in the Diffusion Limitcited by 176
  3. 2022e3nn: Euclidean Neural Networkscited by 174
  4. 2019Learning to Control Self-Assembling Morphologies: A Study of Generalization via Modularitycited by 70
  5. 2021Learning Graph Cellular Automatacited by 33
  6. 2019Direct shape optimization through deep reinforcement learningcited by 28
  7. 2022Variational Neural Cellular Automatacited by 28
  8. 2022Attention-based Neural Cellular Automatacited by 26
  9. 2021Learning to Generate 3D Shapes with Generative Cellular Automatacited by 22
  10. 2020Modeling 3D Shapes by Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  11. 2023E(n)-equivariant Graph Neural Cellular Automatacited by 9
  12. 2024Engineering morphogenesis of cell clusters with differentiable programmingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.