What Do Prosody and Text Convey? Characterizing How Meaningful Information is Distributed Across Multiple Channels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prosody -- the melody of speech -- conveys critical information often not captured by the words or text of a message. In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify how much information is expressed by prosody alone and not by text, and crucially, what that information is about. Our approach applies large speech and language models to estimate the mutual information between a particular dimension of an utterance's meaning (e.g., its emotion) and any of its communication channels (e.g., audio or text). We then use this approach to quantify how much information is conveyed by audio and text about sarcasm, emotion, and questionhood, using speech from television and podcasts. We find that for sarcasm and emotion the audio channel -- and by implication the prosodic channel -- transmits over an order of magnitude more information about these features than the text channel alone, at least when long-term context beyond the current sentence is unavailable. For questionhood, prosody provides comparatively less additional information. We conclude by outlining a program applying our approach to more dimensions of meaning, communication channels, and languages.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.
Builds on
27 of 88 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,342
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2021XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scalecited by 601
- 2020Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning for Speech Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Scaling Speech Technology to 1,000+ Languagescited by 411
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
15 more
- 2019Towards Multimodal Sarcasm Detection (An _Obviously_ Perfect Paper)cited by 174
- 2021SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speechcited by 72
- 2022SLUE Phase-2: A Benchmark Suite of Diverse Spoken Language Understanding Taskscited by 35
- 2023AfriSpeech-200: Pan-African Accented Speech Dataset for Clinical and General Domain ASRcited by 35
- 2023Vistaar: Diverse Benchmarks and Training Sets for Indian Language ASRcited by 21
- 2023N-Shot Benchmarking of Whisper on Diverse Arabic Speech Recognitioncited by 20
- 2024A Survey of Multimodal Sarcasm Detectioncited by 19
- 2025The National Research Platform: Stretched, Multi-Tenant, Scientific Kubernetes Clustercited by 17
- 2023Svarah: Evaluating English ASR Systems on Indian Accentscited by 16
- 2025The MSP-Podcast Corpuscited by 16
- 2023Quantifying the redundancy between prosody and textcited by 12
- 2020On the Relationships Between the Grammatical Genders of Inanimate Nouns and Their Co-Occurring Adjectives and Verbscited by 8
- 2025The time scale of redundancy between prosody and linguistic contextcited by 4
- 2025Prosodic Structure Beyond Lexical Content: A Study of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2025Using Information Theory to Characterize Prosodic Typology: The Case of Tone, Pitch-Accent and Stress-Accentcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.