Scaling Laws for Energy Efficiency of Local LLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency
Abstract (arXiv)
Deploying local large language models and vision-language models on edge devices requires balancing accuracy with constrained computational and energy budgets. Although graphics processors dominate modern artificial-intelligence deployment, most consumer hardware--including laptops, desktops, industrial controllers, and embedded systems--relies on central processing units. Despite this, the computational laws governing central-processing-unit-only inference for local language and vision-language workloads remain largely unexplored. We systematically benchmark large language and vision-language models on two representative central-processing-unit tiers widely used for local inference: a MacBook Pro M2, reflecting mainstream laptop-class deployment, and a Raspberry Pi 5, representing constrained, low-power embedded settings. Using a unified methodology based on continuous sampling of processor and memory usage together with area-under-curve integration, we characterize how computational load scales with input text length for language models and with image resolution for vision-language models. We uncover two empirical scaling laws: (1) computational cost for language-model inference scales approximately linearly with token length; and (2) vision-language models exhibit a preprocessing-driven "resolution knee", where compute remains constant above an internal resolution clamp and decreases sharply below it. Beyond these laws, we show that quantum-inspired compression reduces processor and memory usage by up to 71.9% and energy consumption by up to 62%, while preserving or improving semantic accuracy. These results provide a systematic quantification of multimodal central-processing-unit-only scaling for local language and vision-language workloads, and they identify model compression and input-resolution preprocessing as effective, low-cost levers for sustainable edge inference.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
- 2020Communication-Efficient Edge AI: Algorithms and Systemscited by 95
- 2024Provable Scaling Laws for the Test-Time Compute of Large Language Modelscited by 25
5 more
- 2025Scaling Inference-Efficient Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AIcited by 13
- 2021Optimizing Inference Performance of Transformers on CPUscited by 7
- 2025Sometimes Painful but Certainly Promising: Feasibility and Trade-offs of Language Model Inference at the Edgecited by 3
- 2025Accuracy and Consumption analysis from a compressed model by CompactifAI from Multiverse Computingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Selecting Language Models for Social Science: Start Small, Start Open, and Validatecited by 0
- 2026The Energy Consumption of Transformer Fine-Tuning: A Roofline-Inspired Scaling Modelcited by 0
- 2026Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models as Components of Cognitive Computing architecture for Regulatory Knowledge Managementcited by 0
- 2026Activation-Aware Weight Tensorization: A Calibration-Time Preconditioner for Tensor-Network LLM Compressioncited by 0
- 2026Activation-Aware Weight Tensorization: A Calibration-Time Preconditioner for Tensor-Network LLM Compression7 Oct 2026
- 2026Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models as Components of Cognitive Computing architecture for Regulatory Knowledge Management27 Jul 2026
- 2026The Energy Consumption of Transformer Fine-Tuning: A Roofline-Inspired Scaling Model22 Jun 2026
- 2026Selecting Language Models for Social Science: Start Small, Start Open, and Validate16 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Seeing is Free, Speaking is Not: Uncovering the True Energy Bottleneck in Edge VLM Inference
- 2026Hardware Co-Design Scaling Laws via Roofline Modelling for On-Device LLMs
- 2025Sustainable LLM Inference for Edge AI: Evaluating Quantized LLMs for Energy Efficiency, Output Accuracy, and Inference Latency
- 2026Profiling Lightweight Large Language Models
- 2024Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systems
- 2025Cross-Platform Scaling of Vision-Language-Action Models from Edge to Cloud GPUs
- 2026Watt Counts: Energy-Aware Benchmark for Sustainable LLM Inference on Heterogeneous GPU Architectures
- 2026Characterizing Vision-Language-Action Models across XPUs: Constraints and Acceleration for On-Robot Deployment