Ev-Trust: An Evolutionarily Stable Trust Mechanism for Decentralized LLM-Based Multi-Agent Service Economies
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized LLM-based multi-agent service economies face three vulnerabilities that undermine traditional trust mechanisms: reduced cost of fraud, difficulty in evaluating service quality, and instability of service content. These compounding vulnerabilities can trigger population-level trust collapse and the proliferation of short-sighted strategies. We propose Ev-Trust, an evolutionarily stable trust mechanism that addresses these vulnerabilities through three targeted designs: a cross-validation gate leveraging requestor semantic comprehension to assess response validity, a variance-standardized drift measure filtering endogenous stochasticity from genuine behavioral anomalies, and an embedding of trust signals into the expected revenue function that converts trustworthiness into an evolutionary survival advantage. Based on replicator dynamics with a noisy best response micro-foundation, we prove the asymptotic stability of cooperative evolutionarily stable strategies and derive explicit threshold conditions for maintaining cooperative equilibria. We evaluate Ev-Trust through 100-round simulations with at least 100 heterogeneous LLM-driven agents covering seven behavioral types. The experiments are conducted on TruthfulQA and TriviaQA, two factual question-answering benchmarks. Compared to baselines based on transitive trust aggregation, reinforcement-learning reputation, and pure evolutionary imitation, Ev-Trust reduces malicious agent participation by approximately 60%, suppresses the fraudulent service rate by approximately 50%, and maintains stable trust differentiation under a 30% adversarial mutation. These results demonstrate that coupling semantic trust evaluation with evolutionary incentives provides a principled foundation for securing cooperation in decentralized LLM-based multi-agent systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.
Builds on
22 of 53 references.
References · 22
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models for Communication Games: An Empirical Study on Werewolfcited by 238
- 2023Playing repeated games with Large Language Modelscited by 213
- 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 174
- 2024Agent Smith: A Single Image Can Jailbreak One Million Multimodal LLM Agents Exponentially Fastcited by 149
- 2024Prompt Infection: LLM-to-LLM Prompt Injection within Multi-Agent Systemscited by 126
10 more
- 2024Flooding Spread of Manipulated Knowledge in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Communitiescited by 84
- 2024PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safetycited by 79
- 2024TrustAgent: Towards Safe and Trustworthy LLM-based Agentscited by 62
- 2023Hoodwinked: Deception and Cooperation in a Text-Based Game for Language Modelscited by 46
- 2024Emergence of Social Norms in Generative Agent Societies: Principles and Architecturecited by 41
- 2020BitTensor: A Peer-to-Peer Intelligence Marketcited by 15
- 2022Learning to Deceive in Multi-Agent Hidden Role Gamescited by 5
- 2023Cautiously-Optimistic Knowledge Sharing for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2023Robust Communicative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Active Defensecited by 4
- 2025Bottom-Up Reputation Promotes Cooperation with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Safety in Self-Evolving LLM Agent Systems: Threats, Amplification, and Case Studiescited by 6
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systemscited by 1
- 2026When Should Agent Trust Be Conditional? Characterizing and Attacking Skill-Conditional Reputation in Agent Swarmscited by 0
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems1 Sep 2026
- 2026Safety in Self-Evolving LLM Agent Systems: Threats, Amplification, and Case Studies22 Jun 2026
- 2026When Should Agent Trust Be Conditional? Characterizing and Attacking Skill-Conditional Reputation in Agent Swarms12 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Strategic Exploitation in LLM Agent Markets: A Simulation Framework for E-Commerce Trust
- 2025Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents
- 2026Agent Bazaar: Enabling Economic Alignment in Multi-Agent Marketplaces
- 2026Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions
- 2025The Trust Paradox in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems: When Collaboration Becomes a Security Vulnerability
- 2025From Competition to Coordination: Market Making as a Scalable Framework for Safe and Aligned Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2025Insured Agents: A Decentralized Trust Insurance Mechanism for Agentic Economy
- 2026Evolutionary Dynamics of Cooperation in Next-Generation LLM Agent Systems: A Cross-Provider Empirical Extension