Provably Extracting the Features from a General Superposition
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
It is widely believed that complex machine learning models generally encode features through linear representations. This is the foundational hypothesis behind a vast body of work on interpretability. A key challenge toward extracting interpretable features, however, is that they exist in superposition. In this work, we study the question of extracting features in superposition from a learning theoretic perspective. We start with the following fundamental setting: we are given query access to a function [ f(x)=sumi=1n σi(vi^top x), ] where each unit vector vi encodes a feature direction and σi:R→R is an arbitrary response function and our goal is to recover the vi and the function f. In learning-theoretic terms, superposition refers to the overcomplete regime, when the number of features is larger than the underlying dimension (i.e. n > d), which has proven especially challenging for typical algorithmic approaches. Our main result is an efficient query algorithm that, from noisy oracle access to f, identifies all feature directions whose responses are non-degenerate and reconstructs the function f. Crucially, our algorithm works in a significantly more general setting than all related prior results. We allow for essentially arbitrary superpositions, only requiring that vi, vj are not nearly identical for i neq j, and allowing for general response functions σi. At a high level, our algorithm introduces an approach for searching in Fourier space by iteratively refining the search space to locate the hidden directions vi.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.
Builds on
35 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2022Toy Models of Superposition21 Sep
Other references · 34
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
- 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 159
- 2017Recovery Guarantees for One-hidden-layer Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2022Learning Single-Index Models with Shallow Neural Networkscited by 92
- 2019Reverse-Engineering Deep ReLU Networkscited by 83
- 2017Learning One-hidden-layer Neural Networks with Landscape Designcited by 81
- 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Modelscited by 61
- 2020Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descentcited by 58
- 2023On Learning Gaussian Multi-index Models with Gradient Flowcited by 57
22 more
- 2020Statistical-Query Lower Bounds via Functional Gradientscited by 50
- 2020Algorithms and SQ Lower Bounds for PAC Learning One-Hidden-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 49
- 2024Computational-Statistical Gaps in Gaussian Single-Index Modelscited by 44
- 2024Logits of API-Protected LLMs Leak Proprietary Informationcited by 40
- 2018Learning Two-layer Neural Networks with Symmetric Inputscited by 22
- 2021On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic Neuronscited by 20
- 2023Agnostically Learning Single-Index Models using Omnipredictorscited by 16
- 2021Efficient Algorithms for Learning Depth-2 Neural Networks with General ReLU Activationscited by 15
- 2024Learning Multi-Index Models with Neural Networks via Mean-Field Langevin Dynamicscited by 15
- 2025Survey on Algorithms for multi-index modelscited by 15
- 2021Non-Gaussian Component Analysis via Lattice Basis Reductioncited by 14
- 2020Classification Under Misspecification: Halfspaces, Generalized Linear Models, and Connections to Evolvabilitycited by 13
- 2024Learning sum of diverse features: computational hardness and efficient gradient-based training for ridge combinationscited by 13
- 2023Learning Hidden Markov Models Using Conditional Samplescited by 12
- 2021An Exact Poly-Time Membership-Queries Algorithm for Extraction a three-Layer ReLU Networkcited by 11
- 2024Robustly Learning Single-Index Models via Alignment Sharpnesscited by 11
- 2024Model Stealing for Any Low-Rank Language Modelcited by 9
- 2025Sequences of Logits Reveal the Low Rank Structure of Language Modelscited by 9
- 2013When are Overcomplete Topic Models Identifiable? Uniqueness of Tensor Tucker Decompositions with Structured Sparsitycited by 7
- 2023A faster and simpler algorithm for learning shallow networkscited by 7
- 2021Efficiently Learning Any One Hidden Layer ReLU Network From Queriescited by 6
- 2025Provably Learning from Modern Language Models via Low Logit Rankcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoders13 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Feature Superposition in Neural Networks: From Theory to Practice
- 2026From Data Statistics to Feature Geometry: How Correlations Shape Superposition
- 2026Effects of sparsity and superposition on loss in simple autoencoders
- 2025From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networks
- 2026High-probability guarantees for linear accessibility in feature superposition
- 2024Superposition through Active Learning lens
- 2025SAFR: Neuron Redistribution for Interpretability
- 2024On the Complexity of Neural Computation in Superposition