Metanetworks as Regulatory Operators: Learning to Edit for Requirement Compliance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, e.g. as decision support systems in various societal sectors or in critical infrastructure, designers and auditors are facing the need to ensure that models satisfy a wider variety of requirements (e.g. compliance with regulations, fairness, computational constraints) beyond performance. Although most of them are the subject of ongoing studies, typical approaches face critical challenges: post-processing methods tend to compromise performance, which is often counteracted by fine-tuning or, worse, training from scratch, an often time-consuming or even unavailable strategy. This raises the following question: "Can we efficiently edit models to satisfy requirements, without sacrificing their utility?" In this work, we approach this with a unifying framework, in a data-driven manner, i.e. we learn to edit neural networks (NNs), where the editor is an NN itself - a graph metanetwork - and editing amounts to a single inference step. In particular, the metanetwork is trained on NN populations to minimise an objective consisting of two terms: the requirement to be enforced and the preservation of the NN's utility. We experiment with diverse tasks (the data minimisation principle, bias mitigation and weight pruning) improving the trade-offs between performance, requirement satisfaction and time efficiency compared to popular post-processing or re-training alternatives.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 69 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.
Builds on
69 of 86 references.
References · 69
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
38 more
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 498
- 2022Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Modelscited by 424
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
- 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
- 2017Learning to Prune Deep Neural Networks via Layer-wise Optimal Brain Surgeoncited by 221
- 2015Quantized Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Devicescited by 215
- 2023DepGraph: Towards Any Structural Pruningcited by 203
- 2022From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like onecited by 187
- 2023HyperDiffusion: Generating Implicit Neural Fields with Weight-Space Diffusioncited by 152
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 126
- 2020Learning the Pareto Front with Hypernetworkscited by 125
- 2020Predicting Neural Network Accuracy from Weightscited by 110
- 2023Equivariant Architectures for Learning in Deep Weight Spacescited by 107
- 2019EigenDamage: Structured Pruning in the Kronecker-Factored Eigenbasiscited by 98
- 2020On Learning Sets of Symmetric Elementscited by 98
- 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
- 2023Permutation Equivariant Neural Functionalscited by 70
- 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
- 2020Classifying the classifier: dissecting the weight space of neural networkscited by 65
- 2022On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal Representationscited by 64
- 2022Hyper-Representations as Generative Models: Sampling Unseen Neural Network Weightscited by 64
- 2023Deep Learning on Implicit Neural Representations of Shapescited by 63
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 61
- 2024Graph Neural Networks for Learning Equivariant Representations of Neural Networkscited by 59
- 2023Spatial Functa: Scaling Functa to ImageNet Classification and Generationcited by 57
- 2023Graph Metanetworks for Processing Diverse Neural Architecturescited by 57
50 most cited of 69 All 69 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.