mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Behavior-Aware and Generalizable Defense Against Black-Box Adversarial Attacks for ML-Based IDS

arXiv 2512.13501 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning based intrusion detection systems are increasingly targeted by black box adversarial attacks, where attackers craft evasive inputs using indirect feedback such as binary outputs or behavioral signals like response time and resource usage. While several defenses have been proposed, including input transformation, adversarial training, and surrogate detection, they often fall short in practice. Most are tailored to specific attack types, require internal model access, or rely on static mechanisms that fail to generalize across evolving attack strategies. Furthermore, defenses such as input transformation can degrade intrusion detection system performance, making them unsuitable for real time deployment. To address these limitations, we propose Adaptive Feature Poisoning, a lightweight and proactive defense mechanism designed specifically for realistic black box scenarios. Adaptive Feature Poisoning assumes that probing can occur silently and continuously, and introduces dynamic and context aware perturbations to selected traffic features, corrupting the attacker feedback loop without impacting detection capabilities. The method leverages traffic profiling, change point detection, and adaptive scaling to selectively perturb features that an attacker is likely exploiting, based on observed deviations. We evaluate Adaptive Feature Poisoning against multiple realistic adversarial attack strategies, including silent probing, transferability based attacks, and decision boundary based attacks. The results demonstrate its ability to confuse attackers, degrade attack effectiveness, and preserve detection performance. By offering a generalizable, attack agnostic, and undetectable defense, Adaptive Feature Poisoning represents a significant step toward practical and robust adversarial resilience in machine learning based intrusion detection systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.

Builds on

18 of 48 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  5. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  6. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  7. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
  8. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 172
  9. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 122
  10. 2020DaST: Data-free Substitute Training for Adversarial Attackscited by 60
  11. 2021Modeling Realistic Adversarial Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 41
  12. 2023Adv-Bot: Realistic Adversarial Botnet Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 14
6 more
  1. 2023SoK: Realistic Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Intelligent Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 10
  2. 2019The LogBarrier adversarial attack: making effective use of decision boundary informationcited by 7
  3. 2024Explainable and Transferable Adversarial Attack for ML-Based Network Intrusion Detectorscited by 7
  4. 2024Adversarial Challenges in Network Intrusion Detection Systems: Research Insights and Future Prospectscited by 7
  5. 2021Improving the Robustness of Adversarial Attacks Using an Affine-Invariant Gradient Estimatorcited by 6
  6. 2022FedDef: Defense Against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.