Explainable and Transferable Adversarial Attack for ML-Based Network Intrusion Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
espite being widely used in network intrusion detection systems (NIDSs), machine learning (ML) has proven to be highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. White-box and black-box adversarial attacks of NIDS have been explored in several studies. However, white-box attacks unrealistically assume that the attackers have full knowledge of the target NIDSs. Meanwhile, existing black-box attacks can not achieve high attack success rate due to the weak adversarial transferability between models (e.g., neural networks and tree models). Additionally, neither of them explains why adversarial examples exist and why they can transfer across models. To address these challenges, this paper introduces ETA, an Explainable Transfer-based Black-Box Adversarial Attack framework. ETA aims to achieve two primary objectives: 1) create transferable adversarial examples applicable to various ML models and 2) provide insights into the existence of adversarial examples and their transferability within NIDSs. Specifically, we first provide a general transfer-based adversarial attack method applicable across the entire ML space. Following that, we exploit a unique insight based on cooperative game theory and perturbation interpretations to explain adversarial examples and adversarial transferability. On this basis, we propose an Important-Sensitive Feature Selection (ISFS) method to guide the search for adversarial examples, achieving stronger transferability and ensuring traffic-space constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025The Structural Safety Generalization Problemcited by 2
- 2025Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of IoT Intrusion Detection via SHAP-Based Attribution Fingerprintingcited by 0
- 2025Behavior-Aware and Generalizable Defense Against Black-Box Adversarial Attacks for ML-Based IDScited by 0
- 2025Optimizing the Adversarial Perturbation with a Momentum-based Adaptive Matrixcited by 0
- 2026A Three-Axis Stress Test of LLM vs Classical ML for Network Intrusion Detection under Distribution Shift and Adversarial Evasioncited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic Robustness-driven Universal Adversarial Perturbations with Explainability against Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Intrusion Detection Systemcited by 0
- 2026Out of Sync, Out of Sight: Phantom State Attacks against IIoT Intrusion Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Out of Sync, Out of Sight: Phantom State Attacks against IIoT Intrusion Detection1 Oct 2026
- 2026Probabilistic Robustness-driven Universal Adversarial Perturbations with Explainability against Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Intrusion Detection System24 Sep 2026
- 2026A Three-Axis Stress Test of LLM vs Classical ML for Network Intrusion Detection under Distribution Shift and Adversarial Evasion11 Sep 2026
- 2025Optimizing the Adversarial Perturbation with a Momentum-based Adaptive Matrix16 Dec 2025
- 2025Behavior-Aware and Generalizable Defense Against Black-Box Adversarial Attacks for ML-Based IDS15 Dec 2025
- 2025Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of IoT Intrusion Detection via SHAP-Based Attribution Fingerprinting9 Nov 2025
- 2025The Structural Safety Generalization Problem13 Apr 2025