SkipCat: Rank-Maximized Low-Rank Compression of Large Language Models via Shared Projection and Block Skipping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLM) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks. However, their substantial parameter sizes pose significant challenges for deployment on edge devices with limited computational and memory resources. Low-rank compression is a promising approach to address this issue, as it reduces both computational and memory costs, making LLM more suitable for resource-constrained environments. Nonetheless, na"ive low-rank compression methods require a significant reduction in the retained rank to achieve meaningful memory and computation savings. For a low-rank model, the ranks need to be reduced by more than half to yield efficiency gains. Such aggressive truncation, however, typically results in substantial performance degradation. To address this trade-off, we propose SkipCat, a novel low-rank compression framework that enables the use of higher ranks while achieving the same compression rates. First, we introduce an intra-layer shared low-rank projection method, where multiple matrices that share the same input use a common projection. This reduces redundancy and improves compression efficiency. Second, we propose a block skipping technique that omits computations and memory transfers for selected sub-blocks within the low-rank decomposition. These two techniques jointly enable our compressed model to retain more effective ranks under the same compression budget. Experimental results show that, without any additional fine-tuning, our method outperforms previous low-rank compression approaches by 7% accuracy improvement on zero-shot tasks under the same compression rate. These results highlight the effectiveness of our rank-maximized compression strategy in preserving model performance under tight resource constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
- 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 598
- 2024QuIP#: Even Better LLM Quantization with Hadamard Incoherence and Lattice Codebookscited by 354
8 more
- 2022Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorizationcited by 192
- 2024LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insightscited by 147
- 2018Towards Understanding the Role of Over-Parametrization in Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 140
- 2025SVD-LLM V2: Optimizing Singular Value Truncation for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 63
- 2019Same, Same But Different - Recovering Neural Network Quantization Error Through Weight Factorizationcited by 45
- 2024Basis Sharing: Cross-Layer Parameter Sharing for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 34
- 2023LORD: Low Rank Decomposition Of Monolingual Code LLMs For One-Shot Compressioncited by 26
- 2025LatentLLM: Attention-Aware Joint Tensor Compressioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.