mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structured Personalization: Modeling Constraints as Matroids for Data-Minimal LLM Agents

arXiv 2512.11907 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Personalizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents requires conditioning them on user-specific data, creating a critical trade-off between task utility and data disclosure. While the utility of adding user data often exhibits diminishing returns (i.e., submodularity), enabling near-optimal greedy selection, real-world personalization is complicated by structural constraints. These include logical dependencies (e.g., selecting fact A requires fact B), categorical quotas (e.g., select at most one writing style), and hierarchical rules (e.g., select at most two social media preferences, of which at most one can be for a professional network). These constraints violate the assumptions of standard subset selection algorithms. We propose a principled method to formally model such constraints. We introduce a compilation process that transforms a user's knowledge graph with dependencies into a set of abstract macro-facets. Our central result is a proof that common hierarchical and quota-based constraints over these macro-facets form a valid laminar matroid. This theoretical characterization lets us cast structured personalization as submodular maximization under a matroid constraint, enabling greedy with constant-factor guarantees (and (1-1/e) via continuous greedy) for a much richer and more realistic class of problems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

Builds on

1 of 15 references.

References · 1

  1. 2014A Utility-Theoretic Approach to Privacy in Online Servicescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Many Preferences, Few Policies: Towards Scalable Language Model Personalization
  2. 2026APeB: Benchmarking Personalization Ability of Large Language Model Agents
  3. 2024Unsupervised Human Preference Learning
  4. 2026Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Personalization
  5. 2025POPI: Personalizing LLMs via Optimized Natural Language Preference Inference
  6. 2026Sparse Personalized Text Generation with Multi-Trajectory Reasoning
  7. 2025HyPerAlign: Interpretable Personalized LLM Alignment via Hypothesis Generation
  8. 2026LLM Agents Enable User-Governed Personalization Beyond Platform Boundaries