mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Task-Specific Distance Correlation Matching for Few-Shot Action Recognition

arXiv 2512.11340 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few-shot action recognition (FSAR) has recently made notable progress through set matching and efficient adaptation of large-scale pre-trained models. However, two key limitations persist. First, existing set matching metrics typically rely on cosine similarity to measure inter-frame linear dependencies and then perform matching with only instance-level information, thus failing to capture more complex patterns such as nonlinear relationships and overlooking task-specific cues. Second, for efficient adaptation of CLIP to FSAR, recent work performing fine-tuning via skip-fusion layers (which we refer to as side layers) has significantly reduced memory cost. However, the newly introduced side layers are often difficult to optimize under limited data conditions. To address these limitations, we propose TS-FSAR, a framework comprising three components: (1) a visual Ladder Side Network (LSN) for efficient CLIP fine-tuning; (2) a metric called Task-Specific Distance Correlation Matching (TS-DCM), which uses α-distance correlation to model both linear and nonlinear inter-frame dependencies and leverages a task prototype to enable task-specific matching; and (3) a Guiding LSN with Adapted CLIP (GLAC) module, which regularizes LSN using the adapted frozen CLIP to improve training for better α-distance correlation estimation under limited supervision. Extensive experiments on five widely-used benchmarks demonstrate that our TS-FSAR yields superior performance compared to prior state-of-the-arts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

Builds on

20 of 30 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  5. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
  6. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
  7. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  8. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 856
  9. 2017Temporal Relational Reasoning in Videoscited by 324
  10. 2022LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 230
  11. 2022Frozen CLIP Models are Efficient Video Learnerscited by 182
  12. 2019Few-Shot Video Classification via Temporal Alignmentcited by 125
8 more
  1. 2021Temporal-Relational CrossTransformers for Few-Shot Action Recognitioncited by 84
  2. 2023Revisiting Temporal Modeling for CLIP-based Image-to-Video Knowledge Transferringcited by 58
  3. 2020Depth Guided Adaptive Meta-Fusion Network for Few-shot Video Recognitioncited by 50
  4. 2023Dual-path Adaptation from Image to Video Transformerscited by 41
  5. 2023Boosting Few-shot Action Recognition with Graph-guided Hybrid Matchingcited by 24
  6. 2022Inductive and Transductive Few-Shot Video Classification via Appearance and Temporal Alignmentscited by 23
  7. 2019Correlation Coefficients and Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 20
  8. 2024Rethinking Image-to-Video Adaptation: An Object-centric Perspectivecited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.