Words to Describe What I'm Feeling: Exploring the Potential of AI Agents for High Subjectivity Decisions in Advance Care Planning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Loss of decisional capacity, coupled with the increasing absence of reliable human proxies, raises urgent questions about how individuals' values can be represented in Advance Care Planning (ACP). To probe this fraught design space of high-risk, high-subjectivity decision support, we built an experience prototype (acpagent) and asked 15 participants in 4 workshops to train it to be their personal ACP proxy. We analysed their coping strategies and feature requests and mapped the results onto axes of agent autonomy and human control. Our findings show a surprising 86.7% agreement with acpagent, arguing for a potential new role of AI in ACP where agents act as personal advocates for individuals, building mutual intelligibility over time. We propose that the key areas of future risk that must be addressed are the moderation of users' expectations and designing accountability and oversight over agent deployment and cutoffs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.
Builds on
16 of 93 references.
References · 16
- 2023WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audiocited by 320
- 2023MindfulDiary: Harnessing Large Language Model to Support Psychiatric Patients' Journalingcited by 50
- 2024Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 38
- 2023Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of AI Delegation on Human Task Performance and Task Satisfactioncited by 32
- 2024MindScape Study: Integrating LLM and Behavioral Sensing for Personalized AI-Driven Journaling Experiencescited by 24
- 2024The Typing Cure: Experiences with Large Language Model Chatbots for Mental Health Supportcited by 23
- 2024Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlivescited by 15
- 2019In AI We Trust? Factors That Influence Trustworthiness of AI-infused Decision-Making Processescited by 13
- 2025A Matter of Perspective(s): Contrasting Human and LLM Argumentation in Subjective Decision-Making on Subtle Sexismcited by 9
- 2025Letters from Future Self: Augmenting the Letter-Exchange Exercise with LLM-based Agents to Enhance Young Adults' Career Explorationcited by 8
- 2025Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-Makingcited by 8
- 2024Coaching Copilot: Blended Form of an LLM-Powered Chatbot and a Human Coach to Effectively Support Self-Reflection for Leadership Growthcited by 7
4 more
- 2024Human Delegation Behavior in Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of Contextual Informationcited by 5
- 2024ExploreSelf: Fostering User-driven Exploration and Reflection on Personal Challenges with Adaptive Guidance by Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024Towards Understanding Emotions for Engaged Mental Health Conversationscited by 3
- 2025PreCare: Designing AI Assistants for Advance Care Planning (ACP) to Enhance Personal Value Exploration, Patient Knowledge, and Decisional Confidencecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.