mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TECM*: A Data-Driven Assessment to Reinforcement Learning Methods and Application to Heparin Treatment Strategy for Surgical Sepsis

arXiv 2512.10973 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by severe infection leading to acute organ dysfunction. This study proposes a data-driven metric and a continuous reward function to optimize personalized heparin therapy in surgical sepsis patients. Methods: Data from the MIMIC-IV v1.0 and eICU v2.0 databases were used for model development and evaluation. The training cohort consisted of abdominal surgery patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) after postoperative sepsis onset. We introduce a new RL-based framework: converting the discrete SOFA score to a continuous cxSOFA for more nuanced state and reward functions; Second, defining "good" or "bad" strategies based on cxSOFA by a stepwise manner; Third, proposing a Treatment Effect Comparison Matrix (TECM), analogous to a confusion matrix for classification tasks, to evaluate the treatment strategies. We applied different RL algorithms, Q-Learning, DQN, DDQN, BCQ and CQL to optimize the treatment and comprehensively evaluated the framework. Results: Among the AI-derived strategies, the cxSOFA-CQL model achieved the best performance, reducing mortality from 1.83% to 0.74% with the average hospital stay from 11.11 to 9.42 days. TECM demonstrated consistent outcomes across models, highlighting robustness. Conclusion: The proposed RL framework enables interpretable and robust optimization of heparin therapy in surgical sepsis. Continuous cxSOFA scoring and TECM-based evaluation provide nuanced treatment assessment, showing promise for improving clinical outcomes and decision-support reliability.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.

Builds on

11 of 61 references.

References · 11

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  2. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  3. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  4. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
  5. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,099
  6. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 310
  7. 2020Secure and Robust Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Surveycited by 80
  8. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sepsis Treatmentcited by 71
  9. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes on Medical Registry Datacited by 23
  10. 2020Optimizing Medical Treatment for Sepsis in Intensive Care: from Reinforcement Learning to Pre-Trial Evaluationcited by 8
  11. 2019Performance Dynamics and Termination Errors in Reinforcement Learning: A Unifying Perspectivecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Offline reinforcement learning with uncertainty for treatment strategies in sepsis
  2. 2026Learning Preference-Based Objectives from Clinical Narratives for Dynamic Sepsis Treatment
  3. 2024Empowering Clinicians with Medical Decision Transformers: A Framework for Sepsis Treatment
  4. 2024Development and Validation of Heparin Dosing Policies Using an Offline Reinforcement Learning Algorithm
  5. 2024ICU-Sepsis: A Benchmark MDP Built from Real Medical Data
  6. 2025Exploring a Graph-based Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning for Sepsis Treatment
  7. 2024How Consistent are Clinicians? Evaluating the Predictability of Sepsis Disease Progression with Dynamics Models
  8. 2024Reinforced Sequential Decision-Making for Sepsis Treatment: The POSNEGDM Framework with Mortality Classifier and Transformer