mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detailed balance in large language model-driven agents

arXiv 2512.10047 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2025cs.LG cond-mat.stat-mech cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM)-driven agents are emerging as a powerful new paradigm for solving complex problems. Despite the empirical success of these practices, a theoretical framework to understand and unify their macroscopic dynamics remains lacking. This Letter proposes a method based on the least action principle to estimate the underlying generative directionality of LLMs embedded within agents. By experimentally measuring the transition probabilities between LLM-generated states, we statistically discover a detailed balance in LLM-generated transitions, indicating that LLM generation may not be achieved by generally learning rule sets and strategies, but rather by implicitly learning a class of underlying potential functions that may transcend different LLM architectures and prompt templates. To our knowledge, this is the first discovery of a macroscopic physical law in LLM generative dynamics that does not depend on specific model details. This work is an attempt to establish a macroscopic dynamics theory of complex AI systems, aiming to elevate the study of AI agents from a collection of engineering practices to a science built on effective measurements that are predictable and quantifiable.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

Builds on

12 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges15 May

Other references · 11

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  4. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
  5. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
  6. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  7. 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 867
  8. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  9. 2025Phase Transitions in Large Language Models and the O(N) Modelcited by 12
  10. 2025Neural Thermodynamic Laws for Large Language Model Trainingcited by 10
  11. 2025Scalable Quantum State Preparation via Large-Language-Model-Driven Discoverycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Geometric Dynamics of Agentic Loops in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
  3. 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities
  4. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
  5. 2026PhysicsAgentABM: Physics-Guided Generative Agent-Based Modeling
  6. 2026LLMOrbit: A Circular Taxonomy of Large Language Models -From Scaling Walls to Agentic AI Systems
  7. 2026Why We Need World Models for AGI: Where LLMs Fail and How World Models May Outperform
  8. 2025From Language to Action: A Review of Large Language Models as Autonomous Agents and Tool Users